From d6fbda38f157f5fa8d3f9a5520837d10d4028fc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Sebastian=20Kr=C3=BCger?= Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 12:06:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix: correct UltimateSDUpscale input indices in workflow MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The upscale_model input was at index 5 instead of index 12, causing all widget parameters to be misaligned. Fixed by: - Updating link target index from 5 to 12 for upscale_model - Adding explicit entries for widget parameters in inputs array - Maintaining correct parameter order per custom node definition 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude --- .../ultimate-sd-upscale-production-v1.json | 28 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/comfyui/workflows/upscaling/ultimate-sd-upscale-production-v1.json b/comfyui/workflows/upscaling/ultimate-sd-upscale-production-v1.json index 20285fa..f347423 100644 --- a/comfyui/workflows/upscaling/ultimate-sd-upscale-production-v1.json +++ b/comfyui/workflows/upscaling/ultimate-sd-upscale-production-v1.json @@ -178,6 +178,32 @@ "type": "VAE", "link": 5 }, + { + "name": "upscale_by", + "type": "FLOAT" + }, + { + "name": "seed", + "type": "INT" + }, + { + "name": "steps", + "type": "INT" + }, + { + "name": "cfg", + "type": "FLOAT" + }, + { + "name": "sampler_name" + }, + { + "name": "scheduler" + }, + { + "name": "denoise", + "type": "FLOAT" + }, { "name": "upscale_model", "type": "UPSCALE_MODEL", @@ -250,7 +276,7 @@ [7, 4, 0, 5, 3, "CONDITIONING"], [8, 5, 0, 6, 0, "IMAGE"], [9, 5, 0, 7, 0, "IMAGE"], - [10, 8, 0, 5, 5, "UPSCALE_MODEL"] + [10, 8, 0, 5, 12, "UPSCALE_MODEL"] ], "groups": [], "config": {},