## Summary
Ripgrep is our preferred tool for file search. When users install via
`brew install codex`, it's automatically installed as a dependency. We
want to ensure that users running via an npm install also have this
tool! Microsoft has already solved this problem for VS Code - let's not
reinvent the wheel.
This approach of appending to the PATH directly might be a bit
heavy-handed, but feels reasonably robust to a variety of environment
concerns. Open to thoughts on better approaches here!
## Testing
- [x] confirmed this import approach works with `node -e "const { rgPath
} = require('@vscode/ripgrep'); require('child_process').spawn(rgPath,
['--version'], { stdio: 'inherit' })"`
- [x] Ran codex.js locally with `rg` uninstalled, asked it to run `which
rg`. Output below:
```
⚡ Ran command which rg; echo $?
⎿ /Users/dylan.hurd/code/dh--npm-rg/node_modules/@vscode/ripgrep/bin/rg
0
codex
Re-running to confirm the path and exit code.
- Path: `/Users/dylan.hurd/code/dh--npm-rg/node_modules/@vscode/ripgrep/bin/rg`
- Exit code: `0`
```
# Migrate to pnpm for improved monorepo management
## Summary
This PR migrates the Codex repository from npm to pnpm, providing faster
dependency installation, better disk space usage, and improved monorepo
management.
## Changes
- Added `pnpm-workspace.yaml` to define workspace packages
- Added `.npmrc` with optimal pnpm configuration
- Updated root package.json with workspace scripts
- Moved resolutions and overrides to the root package.json
- Updated scripts to use pnpm instead of npm
- Added documentation for the migration
- Updated GitHub Actions workflow for pnpm
## Benefits
- **Faster installations**: pnpm is significantly faster than npm
- **Disk space savings**: pnpm's content-addressable store avoids
duplication
- **Strict dependency management**: prevents phantom dependencies
- **Simplified monorepo management**: better workspace coordination
- **Preparation for Turborepo**: as discussed, this is the first step
before adding Turborepo
## Testing
- Verified that `pnpm install` works correctly
- Verified that `pnpm run build` completes successfully
- Ensured all existing functionality is preserved
## Documentation
Added a detailed migration guide in `PNPM_MIGRATION.md` explaining:
- Why we're migrating to pnpm
- How to use pnpm with this repository
- Common commands and workspace-specific commands
- Monorepo structure and configuration
## Next Steps
As discussed, once this change is stable, we can consider adding
Turborepo as a follow-up enhancement.
# Shell Command Explanation Option
## Description
This PR adds an option to explain shell commands when the user is
prompted to approve them (Fixes#110). When reviewing a shell command,
users can now select "Explain this command" to get a detailed
explanation of what the command does before deciding whether to approve
or reject it.
## Changes
- Added a new "EXPLAIN" option to the `ReviewDecision` enum
- Updated the command review UI to include an "Explain this command (x)"
option
- Implemented the logic to send the command to the LLM for explanation
using the same model as the agent
- Added a display for the explanation in the command review UI
- Updated all relevant components to pass the explanation through the
component tree
## Benefits
- Improves user understanding of shell commands before approving them
- Reduces the risk of approving potentially harmful commands
- Enhances the educational aspect of the tool, helping users learn about
shell commands
- Maintains the same workflow with minimal UI changes
## Testing
- Manually tested the explanation feature with various shell commands
- Verified that the explanation is displayed correctly in the UI
- Confirmed that the user can still approve or reject the command after
viewing the explanation
## Screenshots
## Additional Notes
The explanation is generated using the same model as the agent, ensuring
consistency in the quality and style of explanations.
---------
Signed-off-by: crazywolf132 <crazywolf132@gmail.com>
# Add Husky and lint-staged for automated code quality checks
## Description
This PR adds Husky Git hooks and lint-staged to automate code quality
checks during the development workflow.
## Features Added
- Pre-commit hook that runs lint-staged to check files before committing
- Pre-push hook that runs tests and type checking before pushing
- Configuration for lint-staged to format and lint different file types
- Documentation explaining the Husky setup and usage
- Updated README.md with information about Git hooks
## Benefits
- Ensures consistent code style across the project
- Prevents pushing code with failing tests or type errors
- Reduces the need for style-related code review comments
- Improves overall code quality
## Implementation Details
- Added Husky and lint-staged as dev dependencies
- Created pre-commit and pre-push hooks
- Added configuration for lint-staged
- Added documentation in HUSKY.md
- Updated README.md with a new section on Git hooks
## Testing
The hooks have been tested locally and work as expected:
- Pre-commit hook runs ESLint and Prettier on staged files
- Pre-push hook runs tests and type checking
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA
---------
Signed-off-by: Alpha Diop <alphakhoss@gmail.com>
...and try to parse the suggested time from the error message while we
don't yet have this in a structured way
---------
Signed-off-by: Thibault Sottiaux <tibo@openai.com>
