Taking a pass at building artifacts per platform so we can consider
different distribution strategies that don't require users to install
the full `cargo` toolchain.
Right now this grabs just the `codex-repl` and `codex-tui` bins for 5
different targets and bundles them into a draft release. I think a
clearly marked pre-release set of artifacts will unblock the next step
of testing.
Previous to this PR, `SandboxPolicy` was a bit difficult to work with:
237f8a11e1/codex-rs/core/src/protocol.rs (L98-L108)
Specifically:
* It was an `enum` and therefore options were mutually exclusive as
opposed to additive.
* It defined things in terms of what the agent _could not_ do as opposed
to what they _could_ do. This made things hard to support because we
would prefer to build up a sandbox config by starting with something
extremely restrictive and only granting permissions for things the user
as explicitly allowed.
This PR changes things substantially by redefining the policy in terms
of two concepts:
* A `SandboxPermission` enum that defines permissions that can be
granted to the agent/sandbox.
* A `SandboxPolicy` that internally stores a `Vec<SandboxPermission>`,
but externally exposes a simpler API that can be used to configure
Seatbelt/Landlock.
Previous to this PR, we supported a `--sandbox` flag that effectively
mapped to an enum value in `SandboxPolicy`. Though now that
`SandboxPolicy` is a wrapper around `Vec<SandboxPermission>`, the single
`--sandbox` flag no longer makes sense. While I could have turned it
into a flag that the user can specify multiple times, I think the
current values to use with such a flag are long and potentially messy,
so for the moment, I have dropped support for `--sandbox` altogether and
we can bring it back once we have figured out the naming thing.
Since `--sandbox` is gone, users now have to specify `--full-auto` to
get a sandbox that allows writes in `cwd`. Admittedly, there is no clean
way to specify the equivalent of `--full-auto` in your `config.toml`
right now, so we will have to revisit that, as well.
Because `Config` presents a `SandboxPolicy` field and `SandboxPolicy`
changed considerably, I had to overhaul how config loading works, as
well. There are now two distinct concepts, `ConfigToml` and `Config`:
* `ConfigToml` is the deserialization of `~/.codex/config.toml`. As one
might expect, every field is `Optional` and it is `#[derive(Deserialize,
Default)]`. Consistent use of `Optional` makes it clear what the user
has specified explicitly.
* `Config` is the "normalized config" and is produced by merging
`ConfigToml` with `ConfigOverrides`. Where `ConfigToml` contains a raw
`Option<Vec<SandboxPermission>>`, `Config` presents only the final
`SandboxPolicy`.
The changes to `core/src/exec.rs` and `core/src/linux.rs` merit extra
special attention to ensure we are faithfully mapping the
`SandboxPolicy` to the Seatbelt and Landlock configs, respectively.
Also, take note that `core/src/seatbelt_readonly_policy.sbpl` has been
renamed to `codex-rs/core/src/seatbelt_base_policy.sbpl` and that
`(allow file-read*)` has been removed from the `.sbpl` file as now this
is added to the policy in `core/src/exec.rs` when
`sandbox_policy.has_full_disk_read_access()` is `true`.
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/642 introduced support for the
`--disable-response-storage` flag, but if you are a ZDR customer, it is
tedious to set this every time, so this PR makes it possible to set this
once in `config.toml` and be done with it.
Incidentally, this tidies things up such that now `init_codex()` takes
only one parameter: `Config`.
This changes how instantiating `Config` works and also adds
`approval_policy` and `sandbox_policy` as fields. The idea is:
* All fields of `Config` have appropriate default values.
* `Config` is initially loaded from `~/.codex/config.toml`, so values in
`config.toml` will override those defaults.
* Clients must instantiate `Config` via
`Config::load_with_overrides(ConfigOverrides)` where `ConfigOverrides`
has optional overrides that are expected to be settable based on CLI
flags.
The `Config` should be defined early in the program and then passed
down. Now functions like `init_codex()` take fewer individual parameters
because they can just take a `Config`.
Also, `Config::load()` used to fail silently if `~/.codex/config.toml`
had a parse error and fell back to the default config. This seemed
really bad because it wasn't clear why the values in my `config.toml`
weren't getting picked up. I changed things so that
`load_with_overrides()` returns `Result<Config>` and verified that the
various CLIs print a reasonable error if `config.toml` is malformed.
Finally, I also updated the TUI to show which **sandbox** value is being
used, as we do for other key values like **model** and **approval**.
This was also a reminder that the various values of `--sandbox` are
honored on Linux but not macOS today, so I added some TODOs about fixing
that.
In putting up https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/665, I discovered
that the `expanduser` crate does not compile on Windows. Looking into
it, we do not seem to need it because we were only using it with a value
that was passed in via a command-line flag, so the shell expands `~` for
us before we see it, anyway. (I changed the type in `Cli` from `String`
to `PathBuf`, to boot.)
If we do need this sort of functionality in the future,
https://docs.rs/shellexpand/latest/shellexpand/fn.tilde.html seems
promising.
This adds support for the `--disable-response-storage` flag across our
multiple Rust CLIs to support customers who have opted into Zero-Data
Retention (ZDR). The analogous changes to the TypeScript CLI were:
* https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/481
* https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/543
For a client using ZDR, `previous_response_id` will never be available,
so the `input` field of an API request must include the full transcript
of the conversation thus far. As such, this PR changes the type of
`Prompt.input` from `Vec<ResponseInputItem>` to `Vec<ResponseItem>`.
Practically speaking, `ResponseItem` was effectively a "superset" of
`ResponseInputItem` already. The main difference for us is that
`ResponseItem` includes the `FunctionCall` variant that we have to
include as part of the conversation history in the ZDR case.
Another key change in this PR is modifying `try_run_turn()` so that it
returns the `Vec<ResponseItem>` for the turn in addition to the
`Vec<ResponseInputItem>` produced by `try_run_turn()`. This is because
the caller of `run_turn()` needs to record the `Vec<ResponseItem>` when
ZDR is enabled.
To that end, this PR introduces `ZdrTranscript` (and adds
`zdr_transcript: Option<ZdrTranscript>` to `struct State` in `codex.rs`)
to take responsibility for maintaining the conversation transcript in
the ZDR case.
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
