- Refactor Exec Cell into its own module
- update exec command rendering to inline the first command line
- limit continuation lines
- always show trimmed output
# External (non-OpenAI) Pull Request Requirements
Before opening this Pull Request, please read the dedicated
"Contributing" markdown file or your PR may be closed:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/contributing.md
If your PR conforms to our contribution guidelines, replace this text
with a detailed and high quality description of your changes.
Instead of overwriting the contents of the composer when pressing
<kbd>Esc</kbd> when there's a queued message, prepend the queued
message(s) to the composer draft.
This eliminates a "bounce" at the end of streaming where we hide the
status indicator at the end of the turn and the composer moves up two
lines.
Also, simplify streaming further by removing the HistorySink and
inverting control, and collapsing a few single-element structures.
## Summary
Introduces a “ghost commit” workflow that snapshots the tree without
touching refs.
1. git commit-tree writes an unreferenced commit object from the current
index, optionally pointing to the current HEAD as its parent.
2. We then stash that commit id and use git restore --source <ghost> to
roll the worktree (and index) back to the recorded snapshot later on.
## Details
- Ghost commits live only as loose objects—we never update branches or
tags—so the repo history stays untouched while still giving us a full
tree snapshot.
- Force-included paths let us stage otherwise ignored files before
capturing the tree.
- Restoration rehydrates both tracked and force-included files while
leaving untracked/ignored files alone.
Adds a "View Stack" to the bottom pane to allow for pushing/popping
bottom panels.
`esc` will go back instead of dismissing.
Benefit: We retain the "selection state" of a parent panel (e.g. the
review panel).
Adds the following options:
1. Review current changes
2. Review a specific commit
3. Review against a base branch (PR style)
4. Custom instructions
<img width="487" height="330" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-20 at 2 11 36 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/edb0aaa5-5747-47fa-881f-cc4c4f7fe8bc"
/>
---
\+ Adds the following UI helpers:
1. Makes list selection searchable
2. Adds navigation to the bottom pane, so you could add a stack of
popups
3. Basic custom prompt view
## 📝 Review Mode -- Core
This PR introduces the Core implementation for Review mode:
- New op `Op::Review { prompt: String }:` spawns a child review task
with isolated context, a review‑specific system prompt, and a
`Config.review_model`.
- `EnteredReviewMode`: emitted when the child review session starts.
Every event from this point onwards reflects the review session.
- `ExitedReviewMode(Option<ReviewOutputEvent>)`: emitted when the review
finishes or is interrupted, with optional structured findings:
```json
{
"findings": [
{
"title": "<≤ 80 chars, imperative>",
"body": "<valid Markdown explaining *why* this is a problem; cite files/lines/functions>",
"confidence_score": <float 0.0-1.0>,
"priority": <int 0-3>,
"code_location": {
"absolute_file_path": "<file path>",
"line_range": {"start": <int>, "end": <int>}
}
}
],
"overall_correctness": "patch is correct" | "patch is incorrect",
"overall_explanation": "<1-3 sentence explanation justifying the overall_correctness verdict>",
"overall_confidence_score": <float 0.0-1.0>
}
```
## Questions
### Why separate out its own message history?
We want the review thread to match the training of our review models as
much as possible -- that means using a custom prompt, removing user
instructions, and starting a clean chat history.
We also want to make sure the review thread doesn't leak into the parent
thread.
### Why do this as a mode, vs. sub-agents?
1. We want review to be a synchronous task, so it's fine for now to do a
bespoke implementation.
2. We're still unclear about the final structure for sub-agents. We'd
prefer to land this quickly and then refactor into sub-agents without
rushing that implementation.
Created this PR by:
- adding `redundant_clone` to `[workspace.lints.clippy]` in
`cargo-rs/Cargol.toml`
- running `cargo clippy --tests --fix`
- running `just fmt`
Though I had to clean up one instance of the following that resulted:
```rust
let codex = codex;
```
This PR changes get history op to get path. Then, forking will use a
path. This will help us have one unified codepath for resuming/forking
conversations. Will also help in having rollout history in order. It
also fixes a bug where you won't see the UI when resuming after forking.
We're trying to migrate from `session_id: Uuid` to `conversation_id:
ConversationId`. Not only does this give us more type safety but it
unifies our terminology across Codex and with the implementation of
session resuming, a conversation (which can span multiple sessions) is
more appropriate.
I started this impl on https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/3219 as part
of getting resume working in the extension but it's big enough that it
should be broken out.
This updates the ctrl + c behavior to clear the current prompt if there
is text and you press ctrl + c.
I also updated the ctrl + c hint text to show `^c to interrupt` instead
of `^c to quit` if there is an active conversation.
Two things I don't love:
1. You can currently interrupt a conversation with escape or ctrl + c
(not related to this PR and maybe fine)
2. The bottom row hint text always says `^c to quit` but this PR doesn't
really make that worse.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6eddadec-0d84-4fa7-abcb-d6f5a04e5748
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/3126
TuiEvent is supposed to be purely events that come from the "driver",
i.e. events from the terminal. Everything app-specific should be an
AppEvent. In this case, it didn't need to be an event at all.
#### Summary
- Emit a “Proposed Command” history cell when an ExecApprovalRequest
arrives (parity with proposed patches).
- Simplify the approval dialog: show only the reason/instructions; move
the command preview into history.
- Make approval/abort decision history concise:
- Single line snippet; if multiline, show first line + " ...".
- Truncate to 80 graphemes with ellipsis for very long commands.
#### Details
- History
- Add `new_proposed_command` to render a header and indented command
preview.
- Use shared `prefix_lines` helper for first/subsequent line prefixes.
- Approval UI
- `UserApprovalWidget` no longer renders the command in the modal; shows
optional `reason` text only.
- Decision history renders an inline, dimmed snippet per rules above.
- Tests (snapshot-based)
- Proposed/decision flow for short command.
- Proposed multi-line + aborted decision snippet with “ ...”.
- Very long one-line command -> truncated snippet with “…”.
- Updated existing exec approval snapshots and test reasons.
<img width="1053" height="704" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 11 57
35 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9ed4c316-9daf-4ac1-80ff-7ae1f481dd10"
/>
after approving:
<img width="1053" height="704" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 11 58
18 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a44e243f-eb9d-42ea-87f4-171b3fb481e7"
/>
rejection:
<img width="1053" height="207" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 11 58
45 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a022664b-ae0e-4b70-a388-509208707934"
/>
big command:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2dd976e5-799f-4af7-9682-a046e66cc494
#### Summary
Avoid a potential panic when rendering the active execution cell when
the allocated area has zero height.
#### Changes
- Guard rendering with `active_cell_area.height > 0` and presence of
`active_exec_cell`.
- Use `saturating_add(1)` for the Y offset to avoid overflow.
- Render via `active_exec_cell.as_ref().unwrap().render_ref(...)` after
the explicit `is_some` check.
