## Summary
#1865 added `AskForApproval::OnRequest`, but missed adding it to our
custom struct in `mcp-server`. This adds the missing configuration
## Testing
- [x] confirmed locally
# Note for reviewers
The bulk of this PR is in in the new file, `parse_command.rs`. This file
is designed to be written TDD and implemented with Codex. Do not worry
about reviewing the code, just review the unit tests (if you want). If
any cases are missing, we'll add more tests and have Codex fix them.
I think the best approach will be to land and iterate. I have some
follow-ups I want to do after this lands. The next PR after this will
let us merge (and dedupe) multiple sequential cells of the same such as
multiple read commands. The deduping will also be important because the
model often reads the same file multiple times in a row in chunks
===
This PR formats common commands like reading, formatting, testing, etc
more nicely:
It tries to extract things like file names, tests and falls back to the
cmd if it doesn't. It also only shows stdout/err if the command failed.
<img width="770" height="238" alt="CleanShot 2025-08-09 at 16 05 15"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0ead179a-8910-486b-aa3d-7d26264d751e"
/>
<img width="348" height="158" alt="CleanShot 2025-08-09 at 16 05 32"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4302681b-5e87-4ff3-85b4-0252c6c485a9"
/>
<img width="834" height="324" alt="CleanShot 2025-08-09 at 16 05 56 2"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/09fb3517-7bd6-40f6-a126-4172106b700f"
/>
Part 2: https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/2097
Part 3: https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/2110
This adds support for easily running Codex backed by a local Ollama
instance running our new open source models. See
https://github.com/openai/gpt-oss for details.
If you pass in `--oss` you'll be prompted to install/launch ollama, and
it will automatically download the 20b model and attempt to use it.
We'll likely want to expand this with some options later to make the
experience smoother for users who can't run the 20b or want to run the
120b.
Co-authored-by: Michael Bolin <mbolin@openai.com>
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/1835 has some messed up history.
This adds support for streaming chat completions, which is useful for ollama. We should probably take a very skeptical eye to the code introduced in this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Ibrahim <aibrahim@openai.com>
This lets us show an accumulating diff across all patches in a turn.
Refer to the docs for TurnDiffTracker for implementation details.
There are multiple ways this could have been done and this felt like the
right tradeoff between reliability and completeness:
*Pros*
* It will pick up all changes to files that the model touched including
if they prettier or another command that updates them.
* It will not pick up changes made by the user or other agents to files
it didn't modify.
*Cons*
* It will pick up changes that the user made to a file that the model
also touched
* It will not pick up changes to codegen or files that were not modified
with apply_patch
Introduce conversation.create handler (handle_create_conversation) and
wire it in MessageProcessor.
Stack:
Top: #1783
Bottom: #1784
---------
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Peal <gpeal@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
- stream command stdout as `ExecCommandStdout` events
- forward streamed stdout to clients and ignore in human output
processor
- adjust call sites for new streaming API
- MCP server: add send-user-message tool to send user input to a running
Codex session
- Added an integration tests for the happy and sad paths
Changes:
• Add tool definition and schema.
• Expose tool in capabilities.
• Route and handle tool requests with validation.
• Tests for success, bad UUID, and missing session.
follow‑ups
• Listen path not implemented yet; the tool is present but marked “don’t
use yet” in code comments.
• Session run flag reset: clear running_session_id_set appropriately
after turn completion/errors.
This is the third PR in a stack.
Stack:
Final: #1686
Intermediate: #1751
First: #1750
- Expose mcp_protocol from mcp-server for reuse in tests and callers.
- In MessageProcessor, detect structured ToolCallRequestParams in
tools/call and forward to a new handler.
- Add handle_new_tool_calls scaffold (returns error for now).
- Test helper: add send_send_user_message_tool_call to McpProcess to
send ConversationSendMessage requests;
This is the second PR in a stack.
Stack:
Final: #1686
Intermediate: #1751
First: #1750
# Summary
- Align MCP server responses with mcp_types by emitting [CallToolResult,
RequestId] instead of an object.
Update send-message result to a tagged enum: Ok or Error { message }.
# Why
Protocol compliance with current MCP schema.
# Tests
- Updated assertions in mcp_protocol.rs for create/stream/send/list and
error cases.
This is the first PR in a stack.
Stack:
Final: #1686
Intermediate: #1751
First: #1750
This adds a tool the model can call to update a plan. The tool doesn't
actually _do_ anything but it gives clients a chance to read and render
the structured plan. We will likely iterate on the prompt and tools
exposed for planning over time.
## Summary
Per the [latest MCP
spec](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/basic#meta),
the `_meta` field is reserved for metadata. In the [Typescript
Schema](0695a497eb/schema/2025-06-18/schema.ts (L37-L40)),
`progressToken` is defined as a value to be attached to subsequent
notifications for that request.
The
[CallToolRequestParams](0695a497eb/schema/2025-06-18/schema.ts (L806-L817))
extends this definition but overwrites the params field. This ambiguity
makes our generated type definitions tricky, so I'm going to skip
`progressToken` field for now and just send back the `requestId`
instead.
In a future PR, we can clarify, update our `generate_mcp_types.py`
script, and update our progressToken logic accordingly.
## Testing
- [x] Added unit tests
- [x] Manually tested with mcp client
1. Emit call_id to exec approval elicitations for mcp client convenience
2. Remove the `-retry` from the call id for the same reason as above but
upstream the reset behavior to the mcp client
1. Added an elicitation for `approve-patch` which is very similar to
`approve-exec`.
2. Extracted both elicitations to their own files to prevent
`codex_tool_runner` from blowing up in size.
## Summary
Adds a new mcp tool call, `codex-reply`, so we can continue existing
sessions. This is a first draft and does not yet support sessions from
previous processes.
## Testing
- [x] tested with mcp client
This PR introduces a single integration test for `cargo mcp`, though it
also introduces a number of reusable components so that it should be
easier to introduce more integration tests going forward.
The new test is introduced in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/elicitation.rs`
and the reusable pieces are in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/common`.
The test itself verifies new functionality around elicitations
introduced in https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/1623 (and the fix
introduced in https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/1629) by doing the
following:
- starts a mock model provider with canned responses for
`/v1/chat/completions`
- starts the MCP server with a `config.toml` to use that model provider
(and `approval_policy = "untrusted"`)
- sends the `codex` tool call which causes the mock model provider to
request a shell call for `git init`
- the MCP server sends an elicitation to the client to approve the
request
- the client replies to the elicitation with `"approved"`
- the MCP server runs the command and re-samples the model, getting a
`"finish_reason": "stop"`
- in turn, the MCP server sends the final response to the original
`codex` tool call
- verifies that `git init` ran as expected
To test:
```
cargo test shell_command_approval_triggers_elicitation
```
In writing this test, I discovered that `ExecApprovalResponse` does not
conform to `ElicitResult`, so I added a TODO to fix that, since I think
that should be updated in a separate PR. As it stands, this PR does not
update any business logic, though it does make a number of members of
the `mcp-server` crate `pub` so they can be used in the test.
One additional learning from this PR is that
`std::process::Command::cargo_bin()` from the `assert_cmd` trait is only
available for `std::process::Command`, but we really want to use
`tokio::process::Command` so that everything is async and we can
leverage utilities like `tokio::time::timeout()`. The trick I came up
with was to use `cargo_bin()` to locate the program, and then to use
`std::process::Command::get_program()` when constructing the
`tokio::process::Command`.
This updates the MCP server so that if it receives an
`ExecApprovalRequest` from the `Codex` session, it in turn sends an [MCP
elicitation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/client/elicitation)
to the client to ask for the approval decision. Upon getting a response,
it forwards the client's decision via `Op::ExecApproval`.
Admittedly, we should be doing the same thing for
`ApplyPatchApprovalRequest`, but this is our first time experimenting
with elicitations, so I'm inclined to defer wiring that code path up
until we feel good about how this one works.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/1623).
* __->__ #1623
* #1622
* #1621
* #1620
Previous to this change, `MessageProcessor` had a
`tokio::sync::mpsc::Sender<JSONRPCMessage>` as an abstraction for server
code to send a message down to the MCP client. Because `Sender` is cheap
to `clone()`, it was straightforward to make it available to tasks
scheduled with `tokio::task::spawn()`.
This worked well when we were only sending notifications or responses
back down to the client, but we want to add support for sending
elicitations in #1623, which means that we need to be able to send
_requests_ to the client, and now we need a bit of centralization to
ensure all request ids are unique.
To that end, this PR introduces `OutgoingMessageSender`, which houses
the existing `Sender<OutgoingMessage>` as well as an `AtomicI64` to mint
out new, unique request ids. It has methods like `send_request()` and
`send_response()` so that callers do not have to deal with
`JSONRPCMessage` directly, as having to set the `jsonrpc` for each
message was a bit tedious (this cleans up `codex_tool_runner.rs` quite a
bit).
We do not have `OutgoingMessageSender` implement `Clone` because it is
important that the `AtomicI64` is shared across all users of
`OutgoingMessageSender`. As such, `Arc<OutgoingMessageSender>` must be
used instead, as it is frequently shared with new tokio tasks.
As part of this change, we update `message_processor.rs` to embrace
`await`, though we must be careful that no individual handler blocks the
main loop and prevents other messages from being handled.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/1622).
* #1623
* __->__ #1622
* #1621
* #1620
This updates the schema in `generate_mcp_types.py` from `2025-03-26` to
`2025-06-18`, regenerates `mcp-types/src/lib.rs`, and then updates all
the code that uses `mcp-types` to honor the changes.
Ran
```
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector just codex mcp
```
and verified that I was able to invoke the `codex` tool, as expected.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/1621).
* #1623
* #1622
* __->__ #1621
- Added support for message and reasoning deltas
- Skipped adding the support in the cli and tui for later
- Commented a failing test (wrong merge) that needs fix in a separate
PR.
Side note: I think we need to disable merge when the CI don't pass.
On a high-level, we try to design `config.toml` so that you don't have
to "comment out a lot of stuff" when testing different options.
Previously, defining a sandbox policy was somewhat at odds with this
principle because you would define the policy as attributes of
`[sandbox]` like so:
```toml
[sandbox]
mode = "workspace-write"
writable_roots = [ "/tmp" ]
```
but if you wanted to temporarily change to a read-only sandbox, you
might feel compelled to modify your file to be:
```toml
[sandbox]
mode = "read-only"
# mode = "workspace-write"
# writable_roots = [ "/tmp" ]
```
Technically, commenting out `writable_roots` would not be strictly
necessary, as `mode = "read-only"` would ignore `writable_roots`, but
it's still a reasonable thing to do to keep things tidy.
Currently, the various values for `mode` do not support that many
attributes, so this is not that hard to maintain, but one could imagine
this becoming more complex in the future.
In this PR, we change Codex CLI so that it no longer recognizes
`[sandbox]`. Instead, it introduces a top-level option, `sandbox_mode`,
and `[sandbox_workspace_write]` is used to further configure the sandbox
when when `sandbox_mode = "workspace-write"` is used:
```toml
sandbox_mode = "workspace-write"
[sandbox_workspace_write]
writable_roots = [ "/tmp" ]
```
This feels a bit more future-proof in that it is less tedious to
configure different sandboxes:
```toml
sandbox_mode = "workspace-write"
[sandbox_read_only]
# read-only options here...
[sandbox_workspace_write]
writable_roots = [ "/tmp" ]
[sandbox_danger_full_access]
# danger-full-access options here...
```
In this scheme, you never need to comment out the configuration for an
individual sandbox type: you only need to redefine `sandbox_mode`.
Relatedly, previous to this change, a user had to do `-c
sandbox.mode=read-only` to change the mode on the command line. With
this change, things are arguably a bit cleaner because the equivalent
option is `-c sandbox_mode=read-only` (and now `-c
sandbox_workspace_write=...` can be set separately).
Though more importantly, we introduce the `-s/--sandbox` option to the
CLI, which maps directly to `sandbox_mode` in `config.toml`, making
config override behavior easier to reason about. Moreover, as you can
see in the updates to the various Markdown files, it is much easier to
explain how to configure sandboxing when things like `--sandbox
read-only` can be used as an example.
Relatedly, this cleanup also made it straightforward to add support for
a `sandbox` option for Codex when used as an MCP server (see the changes
to `mcp-server/src/codex_tool_config.rs`).
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1248.
When using the OpenAI Responses API, we now record the `usage` field for
a `"response.completed"` event, which includes metrics about the number
of tokens consumed. We also introduce `openai_model_info.rs`, which
includes current data about the most common OpenAI models available via
the API (specifically `context_window` and `max_output_tokens`). If
Codex does not recognize the model, you can set `model_context_window`
and `model_max_output_tokens` explicitly in `config.toml`.
When then introduce a new event type to `protocol.rs`, `TokenCount`,
which includes the `TokenUsage` for the most recent turn.
Finally, we update the TUI to record the running sum of tokens used so
the percentage of available context window remaining can be reported via
the placeholder text for the composer:
We could certainly get much fancier with this (such as reporting the
estimated cost of the conversation), but for now, we are just trying to
achieve feature parity with the TypeScript CLI.
Though arguably this improves upon the TypeScript CLI, as the TypeScript
CLI uses heuristics to estimate the number of tokens used rather than
using the `usage` information directly:
296996d74e/codex-cli/src/utils/approximate-tokens-used.ts (L3-L16)
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1242
For the `approval_policy` config option, renames `unless-allow-listed`
to `untrusted`. In general, when it comes to exec'ing commands, I think
"trusted" is a more accurate term than "safe."
Also drops the `AskForApproval::AutoEdit` variant, as we were not really
making use of it, anyway.
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1250.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/1378).
* #1379
* __->__ #1378
This is a major redesign of how sandbox configuration works and aims to
fix https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1248. Specifically, it
replaces `sandbox_permissions` in `config.toml` (and the
`-s`/`--sandbox-permission` CLI flags) with a "table" with effectively
three variants:
```toml
# Safest option: full disk is read-only, but writes and network access are disallowed.
[sandbox]
mode = "read-only"
# The cwd of the Codex task is writable, as well as $TMPDIR on macOS.
# writable_roots can be used to specify additional writable folders.
[sandbox]
mode = "workspace-write"
writable_roots = [] # Optional, defaults to the empty list.
network_access = false # Optional, defaults to false.
# Disable sandboxing: use at your own risk!!!
[sandbox]
mode = "danger-full-access"
```
This should make sandboxing easier to reason about. While we have
dropped support for `-s`, the way it works now is:
- no flags => `read-only`
- `--full-auto` => `workspace-write`
- currently, there is no way to specify `danger-full-access` via a CLI
flag, but we will revisit that as part of
https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1254
Outstanding issue:
- As noted in the `TODO` on `SandboxPolicy::is_unrestricted()`, we are
still conflating sandbox preferences with approval preferences in that
case, which needs to be cleaned up.
This PR introduces support for `-c`/`--config` so users can override
individual config values on the command line using `--config
name=value`. Example:
```
codex --config model=o4-mini
```
Making it possible to set arbitrary config values on the command line
results in a more flexible configuration scheme and makes it easier to
provide single-line examples that can be copy-pasted from documentation.
Effectively, it means there are four levels of configuration for some
values:
- Default value (e.g., `model` currently defaults to `o4-mini`)
- Value in `config.toml` (e.g., user could override the default to be
`model = "o3"` in their `config.toml`)
- Specifying `-c` or `--config` to override `model` (e.g., user can
include `-c model=o3` in their list of args to Codex)
- If available, a config-specific flag can be used, which takes
precedence over `-c` (e.g., user can specify `--model o3` in their list
of args to Codex)
Now that it is possible to specify anything that could be configured in
`config.toml` on the command line using `-c`, we do not need to have a
custom flag for every possible config option (which can clutter the
output of `--help`). To that end, as part of this PR, we drop support
for the `--disable-response-storage` flag, as users can now specify `-c
disable_response_storage=true` to get the equivalent functionality.
Under the hood, this works by loading the `config.toml` into a
`toml::Value`. Then for each `key=value`, we create a small synthetic
TOML file with `value` so that we can run the TOML parser to get the
equivalent `toml::Value`. We then parse `key` to determine the point in
the original `toml::Value` to do the insert/replace. Once all of the
overrides from `-c` args have been applied, the `toml::Value` is
deserialized into a `ConfigToml` and then the `ConfigOverrides` are
applied, as before.
Historically, we spawned the Seatbelt and Landlock sandboxes in
substantially different ways:
For **Seatbelt**, we would run `/usr/bin/sandbox-exec` with our policy
specified as an arg followed by the original command:
d1de7bb383/codex-rs/core/src/exec.rs (L147-L219)
For **Landlock/Seccomp**, we would do
`tokio::runtime::Builder::new_current_thread()`, _invoke
Landlock/Seccomp APIs to modify the permissions of that new thread_, and
then spawn the command:
d1de7bb383/codex-rs/core/src/exec_linux.rs (L28-L49)
While it is neat that Landlock/Seccomp supports applying a policy to
only one thread without having to apply it to the entire process, it
requires us to maintain two different codepaths and is a bit harder to
reason about. The tipping point was
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/1061, in which we had to start
building up the `env` in an unexpected way for the existing
Landlock/Seccomp approach to continue to work.
This PR overhauls things so that we do similar things for Mac and Linux.
It turned out that we were already building our own "helper binary"
comparable to Mac's `sandbox-exec` as part of the `cli` crate:
d1de7bb383/codex-rs/cli/Cargo.toml (L10-L12)
We originally created this to build a small binary to include with the
Node.js version of the Codex CLI to provide support for Linux
sandboxing.
Though the sticky bit is that, at this point, we still want to deploy
the Rust version of Codex as a single, standalone binary rather than a
CLI and a supporting sandboxing binary. To satisfy this goal, we use
"the arg0 trick," in which we:
* use `std::env::current_exe()` to get the path to the CLI that is
currently running
* use the CLI as the `program` for the `Command`
* set `"codex-linux-sandbox"` as arg0 for the `Command`
A CLI that supports sandboxing should check arg0 at the start of the
program. If it is `"codex-linux-sandbox"`, it must invoke
`codex_linux_sandbox::run_main()`, which runs the CLI as if it were
`codex-linux-sandbox`. When acting as `codex-linux-sandbox`, we make the
appropriate Landlock/Seccomp API calls and then use `execvp(3)` to spawn
the original command, so do _replace_ the process rather than spawn a
subprocess. Incidentally, we do this before starting the Tokio runtime,
so the process should only have one thread when `execvp(3)` is called.
Because the `core` crate that needs to spawn the Linux sandboxing is not
a CLI in its own right, this means that every CLI that includes `core`
and relies on this behavior has to (1) implement it and (2) provide the
path to the sandboxing executable. While the path is almost always
`std::env::current_exe()`, we needed to make this configurable for
integration tests, so `Config` now has a `codex_linux_sandbox_exe:
Option<PathBuf>` property to facilitate threading this through,
introduced in https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/1089.
This common pattern is now captured in
`codex_linux_sandbox::run_with_sandbox()` and all of the `main.rs`
functions that should use it have been updated as part of this PR.
The `codex-linux-sandbox` crate added to the Cargo workspace as part of
this PR now has the bulk of the Landlock/Seccomp logic, which makes
`core` a bit simpler. Indeed, `core/src/exec_linux.rs` and
`core/src/landlock.rs` were removed/ported as part of this PR. I also
moved the unit tests for this code into an integration test,
`linux-sandbox/tests/landlock.rs`, in which I use
`env!("CARGO_BIN_EXE_codex-linux-sandbox")` as the value for
`codex_linux_sandbox_exe` since `std::env::current_exe()` is not
appropriate in that case.
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/1086 is a work-in-progress to make
Linux sandboxing work more like Seatbelt where, for the command we want
to sandbox, we build up the command and then hand it, and some sandbox
configuration flags, to another command to set up the sandbox and then
run it.
In the case of Seatbelt, macOS provides this helper binary and provides
it at `/usr/bin/sandbox-exec`. For Linux, we have to build our own and
pass it through (which is what #1086 does), so this makes the new
`codex_linux_sandbox_exe` available on `Config` so that it will later be
available in `exec.rs` when we need it in #1086.
This introduces an experimental `--output-last-message` flag that can be
used to identify a file where the final message from the agent will be
written. Two use cases:
- Ultimately, we will likely add a `--quiet` option to `exec`, but even
if the user does not want any output written to the terminal, they
probably want to know what the agent did. Writing the output to a file
makes it possible to get that information in a clean way.
- Relatedly, when using `exec` in CI, it is easier to review the
transcript written "normally," (i.e., not as JSON or something with
extra escapes), but getting programmatic access to the last message is
likely helpful, so writing the last message to a file gets the best of
both worlds.
I am calling this "experimental" because it is possible that we are
overfitting and will want a more general solution to this problem that
would justify removing this flag.
This is a large change to support a "history" feature like you would
expect in a shell like Bash.
History events are recorded in `$CODEX_HOME/history.jsonl`. Because it
is a JSONL file, it is straightforward to append new entries (as opposed
to the TypeScript file that uses `$CODEX_HOME/history.json`, so to be
valid JSON, each new entry entails rewriting the entire file). Because
it is possible for there to be multiple instances of Codex CLI writing
to `history.jsonl` at once, we use advisory file locking when working
with `history.jsonl` in `codex-rs/core/src/message_history.rs`.
Because we believe history is a sufficiently useful feature, we enable
it by default. Though to provide some safety, we set the file
permissions of `history.jsonl` to be `o600` so that other users on the
system cannot read the user's history. We do not yet support a default
list of `SENSITIVE_PATTERNS` as the TypeScript CLI does:
3fdf9df133/codex-cli/src/utils/storage/command-history.ts (L10-L17)
We are going to take a more conservative approach to this list in the
Rust CLI. For example, while `/\b[A-Za-z0-9-_]{20,}\b/` might exclude
sensitive information like API tokens, it would also exclude valuable
information such as references to Git commits.
As noted in the updated documentation, users can opt-out of history by
adding the following to `config.toml`:
```toml
[history]
persistence = "none"
```
Because `history.jsonl` could, in theory, be quite large, we take a[n
arguably overly pedantic] approach in reading history entries into
memory. Specifically, we start by telling the client the current number
of entries in the history file (`history_entry_count`) as well as the
inode (`history_log_id`) of `history.jsonl` (see the new fields on
`SessionConfiguredEvent`).
The client is responsible for keeping new entries in memory to create a
"local history," but if the user hits up enough times to go "past" the
end of local history, then the client should use the new
`GetHistoryEntryRequest` in the protocol to fetch older entries.
Specifically, it should pass the `history_log_id` it was given
originally and work backwards from `history_entry_count`. (It should
really fetch history in batches rather than one-at-a-time, but that is
something we can improve upon in subsequent PRs.)
The motivation behind this crazy scheme is that it is designed to defend
against:
* The `history.jsonl` being truncated during the session such that the
index into the history is no longer consistent with what had been read
up to that point. We do not yet have logic to enforce a `max_bytes` for
`history.jsonl`, but once we do, we will aspire to implement it in a way
that should result in a new inode for the file on most systems.
* New items from concurrent Codex CLI sessions amending to the history.
Because, in absence of truncation, `history.jsonl` is an append-only
log, so long as the client reads backwards from `history_entry_count`,
it should always get a consistent view of history. (That said, it will
not be able to read _new_ commands from concurrent sessions, but perhaps
we will introduce a `/` command to reload latest history or something
down the road.)
Admittedly, my testing of this feature thus far has been fairly light. I
expect we will find bugs and introduce enhancements/fixes going forward.
