https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/855 added the clippy warning to
disallow `unwrap()`, but apparently we were not verifying that tests
were "clippy clean" in CI, so I ended up with a lot of local errors in
VS Code.
This turns on the check in CI and fixes the offenders.
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/800 kicked off some work to be more
disciplined about honoring the `cwd` param passed in rather than
assuming `std::env::current_dir()` as the `cwd`. As part of this, we
need to ensure `apply_patch` calls honor the appropriate `cwd` as well,
which is significant if the paths in the `apply_patch` arg are not
absolute paths themselves. Failing that:
- The `apply_patch` function call can contain an optional`workdir`
param, so:
- If specified and is an absolute path, it should be used to resolve
relative paths
- If specified and is a relative path, should be resolved against
`Config.cwd` and then any relative paths will be resolved against the
result
- If `workdir` is not specified on the function call, relative paths
should be resolved against `Config.cwd`
Note that we had a similar issue in the TypeScript CLI that was fixed in
https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/556.
As part of the fix, this PR introduces `ApplyPatchAction` so clients can
deal with that instead of the raw `HashMap<PathBuf,
ApplyPatchFileChange>`. This enables us to enforce, by construction,
that all paths contained in the `ApplyPatchAction` are absolute paths.
In order to expose Codex via an MCP server, I realized that we should be
taking `cwd` as a parameter rather than assuming
`std::env::current_dir()` as the `cwd`. Specifically, the user may want
to start a session in a directory other than the one where the MCP
server has been started.
This PR makes `cwd: PathBuf` a required field of `Session` and threads
it all the way through, though I think there is still an issue with not
honoring `workdir` for `apply_patch`, which is something we also had to
fix in the TypeScript version: https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/556.
This also adds `-C`/`--cd` to change the cwd via the command line.
To test, I ran:
```
cargo run --bin codex -- exec -C /tmp 'show the output of ls'
```
and verified it showed the contents of my `/tmp` folder instead of
`$PWD`.
Previous to this PR, `SandboxPolicy` was a bit difficult to work with:
237f8a11e1/codex-rs/core/src/protocol.rs (L98-L108)
Specifically:
* It was an `enum` and therefore options were mutually exclusive as
opposed to additive.
* It defined things in terms of what the agent _could not_ do as opposed
to what they _could_ do. This made things hard to support because we
would prefer to build up a sandbox config by starting with something
extremely restrictive and only granting permissions for things the user
as explicitly allowed.
This PR changes things substantially by redefining the policy in terms
of two concepts:
* A `SandboxPermission` enum that defines permissions that can be
granted to the agent/sandbox.
* A `SandboxPolicy` that internally stores a `Vec<SandboxPermission>`,
but externally exposes a simpler API that can be used to configure
Seatbelt/Landlock.
Previous to this PR, we supported a `--sandbox` flag that effectively
mapped to an enum value in `SandboxPolicy`. Though now that
`SandboxPolicy` is a wrapper around `Vec<SandboxPermission>`, the single
`--sandbox` flag no longer makes sense. While I could have turned it
into a flag that the user can specify multiple times, I think the
current values to use with such a flag are long and potentially messy,
so for the moment, I have dropped support for `--sandbox` altogether and
we can bring it back once we have figured out the naming thing.
Since `--sandbox` is gone, users now have to specify `--full-auto` to
get a sandbox that allows writes in `cwd`. Admittedly, there is no clean
way to specify the equivalent of `--full-auto` in your `config.toml`
right now, so we will have to revisit that, as well.
Because `Config` presents a `SandboxPolicy` field and `SandboxPolicy`
changed considerably, I had to overhaul how config loading works, as
well. There are now two distinct concepts, `ConfigToml` and `Config`:
* `ConfigToml` is the deserialization of `~/.codex/config.toml`. As one
might expect, every field is `Optional` and it is `#[derive(Deserialize,
Default)]`. Consistent use of `Optional` makes it clear what the user
has specified explicitly.
* `Config` is the "normalized config" and is produced by merging
`ConfigToml` with `ConfigOverrides`. Where `ConfigToml` contains a raw
`Option<Vec<SandboxPermission>>`, `Config` presents only the final
`SandboxPolicy`.
The changes to `core/src/exec.rs` and `core/src/linux.rs` merit extra
special attention to ensure we are faithfully mapping the
`SandboxPolicy` to the Seatbelt and Landlock configs, respectively.
Also, take note that `core/src/seatbelt_readonly_policy.sbpl` has been
renamed to `codex-rs/core/src/seatbelt_base_policy.sbpl` and that
`(allow file-read*)` has been removed from the `.sbpl` file as now this
is added to the policy in `core/src/exec.rs` when
`sandbox_policy.has_full_disk_read_access()` is `true`.
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
