Introduces support for slash commands like in the TypeScript CLI. We do
not support the full set of commands yet, but the core abstraction is
there now.
In particular, we have a `SlashCommand` enum and due to thoughtful use
of the [strum](https://crates.io/crates/strum) crate, it requires
minimal boilerplate to add a new command to the list.
The key new piece of UI is `CommandPopup`, though the keyboard events
are still handled by `ChatComposer`. The behavior is roughly as follows:
* if the first character in the composer is `/`, the command popup is
displayed (if you really want to send a message to Codex that starts
with a `/`, simply put a space before the `/`)
* while the popup is displayed, up/down can be used to change the
selection of the popup
* if there is a selection, hitting tab completes the command, but does
not send it
* if there is a selection, hitting enter sends the command
* if the prefix of the composer matches a command, the command will be
visible in the popup so the user can see the description (commands could
take arguments, so additional text may appear after the command name
itself)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/39c3e6ee-eeb7-4ef7-a911-466d8184975f
Incidentally, Codex wrote almost all the code for this PR!
* update `SessionConfigured` event to include the UUID for the session
* show the UUID in the Rust TUI
* use local timestamps in log files instead of UTC
* include timestamps in log file names for easier discovery
Noticed that when pasting multi-line blocks, each newline was treated
like a new submission.
Update tui to handle Paste directly and map newlines to shift+enter.
# Test
Copied this into clipboard:
```
Do nothing.
Explain this repo to me.
```
Pasted in and saw multi-line input. Hitting Enter then submitted the
full block.
Sets submodules to use workspace lints. Added denying unwrap as a
workspace level lint, which found a couple of cases where we could have
propagated errors. Also manually labeled ones that were fine by my eye.
This introduces the use of the `tui-markdown` crate to parse an
assistant message as Markdown and style it using ANSI for a better user
experience. As shown in the screenshot below, it has support for syntax
highlighting for _tagged_ fenced code blocks:
<img width="907" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/900dc229-80bb-46e8-b1bb-efee4c70ba3c"
/>
That said, `tui-markdown` is not as configurable (or stylish!) as
https://www.npmjs.com/package/marked-terminal, which is what we use in
the TypeScript CLI. In particular:
* The styles are hardcoded and `tui_markdown::from_str()` does not take
any options whatsoever. It uses "bold white" for inline code style which
does not stand out as much as the yellow used by `marked-terminal`:
65402cbda7/tui-markdown/src/lib.rs (L464)
I asked Codex to take a first pass at this and it came up with:
https://github.com/joshka/tui-markdown/pull/80
* If a fenced code block is not tagged, then it does not get
highlighted. I would rather add some logic here:
65402cbda7/tui-markdown/src/lib.rs (L262)
that uses something like https://pypi.org/project/guesslang/ to examine
the value of `text` and try to use the appropriate syntax highlighter.
* When we have a fenced code block, we do not want to show the opening
and closing triple backticks in the output.
To unblock ourselves, we might want to bundle our own fork of
`tui-markdown` temporarily until we figure out what the shape of the API
should be and then try to upstream it.
Some effects of this change:
- New formatting changes across many files. No functionality changes
should occur from that.
- Calls to `set_env` are considered unsafe, since this only happens in
tests we wrap them in `unsafe` blocks
I started this PR because I wanted to share the `format_duration()`
utility function in `codex-rs/exec/src/event_processor.rs` with the TUI.
The question was: where to put it?
`core` should have as few dependencies as possible, so moving it there
would introduce a dependency on `chrono`, which seemed undesirable.
`core` already had this `cli` feature to deal with a similar situation
around sharing common utility functions, so I decided to:
* make `core` feature-free
* introduce `common`
* `common` can have as many "special interest" features as it needs,
each of which can declare their own deps
* the first two features of common are `cli` and `elapsed`
In practice, this meant updating a number of `Cargo.toml` files,
replacing this line:
```toml
codex-core = { path = "../core", features = ["cli"] }
```
with these:
```toml
codex-core = { path = "../core" }
codex-common = { path = "../common", features = ["cli"] }
```
Moving `format_duration()` into its own file gave it some "breathing
room" to add a unit test, so I had Codex generate some tests and new
support for durations over 1 minute.
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
