Updated the position of the cursor on the user input box to be at the
end of the text when the user uses the arrow keys to navigate through
the input history in order to better match the behavior of a terminal.
This adds support for a new flag, `-w,--writable-root`, that can be
specified multiple times to _amend_ the list of folders that should be
configured as "writable roots" by the sandbox used in `full-auto` mode.
Values that are passed as relative paths will be resolved to absolute
paths.
Incidentally, this required updating a number of the `agent*.test.ts`
files: it feels like some of the setup logic across those tests could be
consolidated.
In my testing, it seems that this might be slightly out of distribution
for the model, as I had to explicitly tell it to run `apply_patch` and
that it had the permissions to write those files (initially, it just
showed me a diff and told me to apply it myself). Nevertheless, I think
this is a good starting point.
# Shell Command Explanation Option
## Description
This PR adds an option to explain shell commands when the user is
prompted to approve them (Fixes#110). When reviewing a shell command,
users can now select "Explain this command" to get a detailed
explanation of what the command does before deciding whether to approve
or reject it.
## Changes
- Added a new "EXPLAIN" option to the `ReviewDecision` enum
- Updated the command review UI to include an "Explain this command (x)"
option
- Implemented the logic to send the command to the LLM for explanation
using the same model as the agent
- Added a display for the explanation in the command review UI
- Updated all relevant components to pass the explanation through the
component tree
## Benefits
- Improves user understanding of shell commands before approving them
- Reduces the risk of approving potentially harmful commands
- Enhances the educational aspect of the tool, helping users learn about
shell commands
- Maintains the same workflow with minimal UI changes
## Testing
- Manually tested the explanation feature with various shell commands
- Verified that the explanation is displayed correctly in the UI
- Confirmed that the user can still approve or reject the command after
viewing the explanation
## Screenshots
## Additional Notes
The explanation is generated using the same model as the agent, ensuring
consistency in the quality and style of explanations.
---------
Signed-off-by: crazywolf132 <crazywolf132@gmail.com>
This PR adds a command history persistence feature to Codex CLI that:
1. **Stores command history**: Commands are saved to
`~/.codex/history.json` and persist between CLI sessions.
2. **Navigates history**: Users can use the up/down arrow keys to
navigate through command history, similar to a traditional shell.
3. **Filters sensitive data**: Built-in regex patterns prevent commands
containing API keys, passwords, or tokens from being saved.
4. **Configurable**: Added configuration options for history size,
enabling/disabling history, and custom regex patterns for sensitive
content.
5. **New command**: Added `/clearhistory` command to clear command
history.
## Code Changes
- Added `src/utils/storage/command-history.ts` with functions for
history management
- Extended config system to support history settings
- Updated terminal input components to use persistent history
- Added help text for the new `/clearhistory` command
- Added CLAUDE.md file for guidance when working with the codebase
## Testing
- All tests are passing
- Core functionality works with both input components (standard and
multiline)
- History navigation behaves correctly at line boundaries with the
multiline editor
I had Codex read #182 and draft a PR to fix it. This is its suggested
approach. I've tested it and it works. It removes the purple `thinking
for 386s` type lines entirely, and replaces them with a single yellow
`thinking for #s` line:
```
thinking for 31s
╭────────────────────────────────────────╮
│( ● ) Thinking..
╰────────────────────────────────────────╯
```
prompt. I've been using it that way via `npm run dev`, and prefer it.
## What
Empty "reasoning" updates were showing up as blank lines in the terminal
chat history. We now short-circuit and return `null` whenever
`message.summary` is empty, so those no-ops are suppressed.
## How
- In `TerminalChatResponseReasoning`, return early if `message.summary`
is falsy or empty.
- In `TerminalMessageHistory`, drop any reasoning items whose
`summary.length === 0`.
- Swapped out the loose `any` cast for a safer `unknown`-based cast.
- Rolled back the temporary Vitest script hacks that were causing stack
overflows.
## Why
Cluttering the chat with empty lines was confusing; this change ensures
only real reasoning text is rendered.
Reference: openai/codex#182
---------
Co-authored-by: Thibault Sottiaux <tibo@openai.com>
## Description
This PR fixes the issue where the CLI can't continue after interrupting
the assistant with ESC ESC (Fixes#114). The problem was caused by
duplicate code in the `cancel()` method and improper state reset after
cancellation.
## Changes
- Fixed duplicate code in the `cancel()` method of the `AgentLoop` class
- Added proper reset of the `currentStream` property in the `cancel()`
method
- Created a new `AbortController` after aborting the current one to
ensure future tool calls work
- Added a system message to indicate the interruption to the user
- Added a comprehensive test to verify the fix
## Benefits
- Users can now continue using the CLI after interrupting the assistant
- Improved user experience by providing feedback when interruption
occurs
- Better state management in the agent loop
## Testing
- Added a dedicated test that verifies the agent can process new input
after cancellation
- Manually tested the fix by interrupting the assistant and confirming
that new input is processed correctly
---------
Signed-off-by: crazywolf132 <crazywolf132@gmail.com>
Previously, `parseToolCall()` was using `computeAutoApproval()`, which
was a somewhat parallel implementation of `canAutoApprove()` in order to
get `SafeCommandReason` metadata for presenting information to the user.
The only function that was using `SafeCommandReason` was
`useMessageGrouping()`, but it turns out that function was unused, so
this PR removes `computeAutoApproval()` and all code related to it.
More importantly, I believe this fixes
https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/87 because
`computeAutoApproval()` was calling `parse()` from `shell-quote` without
wrapping it in a try-catch. This PR updates `canAutoApprove()` to use a
tighter try-catch block that is specific to `parse()` and returns an
appropriate `SafetyAssessment` in the event of an error, based on the
`ApprovalPolicy`.
Signed-off-by: Michael Bolin <mbolin@openai.com>
