This PR adds support for streamable HTTP MCP servers when the
`experimental_use_rmcp_client` is enabled.
To set one up, simply add a new mcp server config with the url:
```
[mcp_servers.figma]
url = "http://127.0.0.1:3845/mcp"
```
It also supports an optional `bearer_token` which will be provided in an
authorization header. The full oauth flow is not supported yet.
The config parsing will throw if it detects that the user mixed and
matched config fields (like command + bearer token or url + env).
The best way to review it is to review `core/src` and then
`rmcp-client/src/rmcp_client.rs` first. The rest is tests and
propagating the `Transport` struct around the codebase.
Example with the Figma MCP:
<img width="5084" height="1614" alt="CleanShot 2025-09-26 at 13 35 40"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eaf2771e-df3e-4300-816b-184d7dec5a28"
/>
- Refactor Exec Cell into its own module
- update exec command rendering to inline the first command line
- limit continuation lines
- always show trimmed output
- Only show the usage data section when signed in with ChatGPT. (Tested
with Chat auth and API auth.)
- Friendlier string change.
- Also removed `.dim()` on the string, since it was the only string in
`/status` that was dim.
The only file to watch is the cargo.toml
All the others come from just fix + a few manual small fix
The set of rules have been taken from the list of clippy rules
arbitrarily while trying to optimise the learning and style of the code
while limiting the loss of productivity
No (intended) functional change.
This refactors the transcript view to hold a list of HistoryCells
instead of a list of Lines. This simplifies and makes much of the logic
more robust, as well as laying the groundwork for future changes, e.g.
live-updating history cells in the transcript.
Similar to #2879 in goal. Fixes#2755.
`ClientRequest::NewConversation` picks up the reasoning level from the user's defaults in `config.toml`, so it should be reported in `NewConversationResponse`.
Created this PR by:
- adding `redundant_clone` to `[workspace.lints.clippy]` in
`cargo-rs/Cargol.toml`
- running `cargo clippy --tests --fix`
- running `just fmt`
Though I had to clean up one instance of the following that resulted:
```rust
let codex = codex;
```
Adding the `rollout_path` to the `NewConversationResponse` makes it so a
client can perform subsequent operations on a `(ConversationId,
PathBuf)` pair. #3353 will introduce support for `ArchiveConversation`.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/3352).
* #3353
* __->__ #3352
- In the bottom line of the TUI, print the number of tokens to 3 sigfigs
with an SI suffix, e.g. "1.23K".
- Elsewhere where we print a number, I figure it's worthwhile to print
the exact number, because e.g. it's a summary of your session. Here we print
the numbers comma-separated.
#### Summary
- highlight proposed command previews with the shared bash syntax
highlighter
- keep the Proposed Command section consistent with other execution
renderings
We're trying to migrate from `session_id: Uuid` to `conversation_id:
ConversationId`. Not only does this give us more type safety but it
unifies our terminology across Codex and with the implementation of
session resuming, a conversation (which can span multiple sessions) is
more appropriate.
I started this impl on https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/3219 as part
of getting resume working in the extension but it's big enough that it
should be broken out.
i'm not yet convinced i have the best heuristics for what to highlight,
but this feels like a useful step towards something a bit easier to
read, esp. when the model is producing large commands.
<img width="669" height="589" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 8 21 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b9cbcc43-80e8-4d41-93c8-daa74b84b331"
/>
also a fairly significant refactor of our line wrapping logic.
#### Summary
- Emit a “Proposed Command” history cell when an ExecApprovalRequest
arrives (parity with proposed patches).
- Simplify the approval dialog: show only the reason/instructions; move
the command preview into history.
- Make approval/abort decision history concise:
- Single line snippet; if multiline, show first line + " ...".
- Truncate to 80 graphemes with ellipsis for very long commands.
#### Details
- History
- Add `new_proposed_command` to render a header and indented command
preview.
- Use shared `prefix_lines` helper for first/subsequent line prefixes.
- Approval UI
- `UserApprovalWidget` no longer renders the command in the modal; shows
optional `reason` text only.
- Decision history renders an inline, dimmed snippet per rules above.
- Tests (snapshot-based)
- Proposed/decision flow for short command.
- Proposed multi-line + aborted decision snippet with “ ...”.
- Very long one-line command -> truncated snippet with “…”.
- Updated existing exec approval snapshots and test reasons.
<img width="1053" height="704" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 11 57
35 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9ed4c316-9daf-4ac1-80ff-7ae1f481dd10"
/>
after approving:
<img width="1053" height="704" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 11 58
18 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a44e243f-eb9d-42ea-87f4-171b3fb481e7"
/>
rejection:
<img width="1053" height="207" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 11 58
45 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a022664b-ae0e-4b70-a388-509208707934"
/>
big command:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2dd976e5-799f-4af7-9682-a046e66cc494
### Overview
This PR introduces the following changes:
1. Adds a unified mechanism to convert ResponseItem into EventMsg.
2. Ensures that when a session is initialized with initial history, a
vector of EventMsg is sent along with the session configuration. This
allows clients to re-render the UI accordingly.
3. Added integration testing
### Caveats
This implementation does not send every EventMsg that was previously
dispatched to clients. The excluded events fall into two categories:
• “Arguably” rolled-out events
Examples include tool calls and apply-patch calls. While these events
are conceptually rolled out, we currently only roll out ResponseItems.
These events are already being handled elsewhere and transformed into
EventMsg before being sent.
• Non-rolled-out events
Certain events such as TurnDiff, Error, and TokenCount are not rolled
out at all.
### Future Directions
At present, resuming a session involves maintaining two states:
• UI State
Clients can replay most of the important UI from the provided EventMsg
history.
• Model State
The model receives the complete session history to reconstruct its
internal state.
This design provides a solid foundation. If, in the future, more precise
UI reconstruction is needed, we have two potential paths:
1. Introduce a third data structure that allows us to derive both
ResponseItems and EventMsgs.
2. Clearly divide responsibilities: the core system ensures the
integrity of the model state, while clients are responsible for
reconstructing the UI.
- Summary:
- Updated the hardcoded hyperlink shown when no MCP servers are
configured to point at the canonical docs section:
- From: codex-rs/config.md#mcp_servers (moved/obsolete)
- To: docs/config.md#mcp_servers (correct GitHub path)
- Rationale:
- The TUI link was pointing to a file that only redirects; this makes
the link accurate and reduces user confusion.
- Validation:
- Verified that the target anchor exists at:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/config.md#mcp_servers
- UI behavior unchanged otherwise (rendering of link text remains “MCP
docs”).
- Impact:
- One-line change in TUI display logic; no functional behavior change.
Co-authored-by: Michael Bolin <mbolin@openai.com>
