Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Bolin
8a26ea0fe0 fix: stop building codex-exec and codex-linux-sandbox binaries (#2036)
Release builds are taking awhile and part of the reason that we are
building binaries that we are not really using. Adding Windows binaries
into releases (https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/2035) slows things
down, so we need to get some time back.

- `codex-exec` is basically a standalone `codex exec` that we were
offering because it's a bit smaller as it does not include all the bits
to power the TUI. We were using it in our experimental GitHub Action, so
this PR updates the Action to use `codex exec` instead.
- `codex-linux-sandbox` was a helper binary for the TypeScript version
of the CLI, but I am about to axe that, so we don't need this either.

If we decide to bring `codex-exec` back at some point, we should use a
separate instances so we can build it in parallel with `codex`. (I think
if we had beefier build machines, this wouldn't be so bad, but that's
not the case with the default runners from GitHub.)
2025-08-08 13:42:33 -07:00
Michael Bolin
ae88b69b09 fix: add more instructions to ensure GitHub Action reviews only the necessary code (#1887)
Empirically, we have seen the GitHub Action comment on code outside of
the PR, so try to provide additional instructions in the prompt to avoid
this.
2025-08-06 10:39:58 -07:00
Michael Bolin
e207f20f64 fix: add extra debugging to GitHub Action (#1173)
https://github.com/openai/codex/actions/runs/15352839832/job/43205041563
appeared to fail around `postComment()`, but I don't see the output from
`fail()` in the logs. Adding a bit more info.
2025-05-30 11:16:30 -07:00
Michael Bolin
baa92f37e0 feat: initial import of experimental GitHub Action (#1170)
This is a first cut at a GitHub Action that lets you define prompt
templates in `.md` files under `.github/codex/labels` that will run
Codex with the associated prompt when the label is added to a GitHub
pull request.

For example, this PR includes these files:

```
.github/codex/labels/codex-attempt.md
.github/codex/labels/codex-code-review.md
.github/codex/labels/codex-investigate-issue.md
```

And the new `.github/workflows/codex.yml` workflow declares the
following triggers:

```yaml
on:
  issues:
    types: [opened, labeled]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]
    types: [labeled]
```

as well as the following expression to gate the action:

```
jobs:
  codex:
    if: |
      (github.event_name == 'issues' && (
        (github.event.action == 'labeled' && (github.event.label.name == 'codex-attempt' || github.event.label.name == 'codex-investigate-issue'))
      )) ||
      (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.action == 'labeled' && github.event.label.name == 'codex-code-review')
```

Note the "actor" who added the label must have write access to the repo
for the action to take effect.

After adding a label, the action will "ack" the request by replacing the
original label (e.g., `codex-review`) with an `-in-progress` suffix
(e.g., `codex-review-in-progress`). When it is finished, it will swap
the `-in-progress` label with a `-completed` one (e.g.,
`codex-review-completed`).

Users of the action are responsible for providing an `OPENAI_API_KEY`
and making it available as a secret to the action.
2025-05-30 10:55:28 -07:00