This PR adds support for a model-based summary and risk assessment for
commands that violate the sandbox policy and require user approval. This
aids the user in evaluating whether the command should be approved.
The feature works by taking a failed command and passing it back to the
model and asking it to summarize the command, give it a risk level (low,
medium, high) and a risk category (e.g. "data deletion" or "data
exfiltration"). It uses a new conversation thread so the context in the
existing thread doesn't influence the answer. If the call to the model
fails or takes longer than 5 seconds, it falls back to the current
behavior.
For now, this is an experimental feature and is gated by a config key
`experimental_sandbox_command_assessment`.
Here is a screen shot of the approval prompt showing the risk assessment
and summary.
<img width="723" height="282" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4597dd7c-d5a0-4e9f-9d13-414bd082fd6b"
/>
## Summary
- make the plan tool available by default by removing the feature flag
and always registering the handler
- drop plan-tool CLI and API toggles across the exec, TUI, MCP server,
and app server code paths
- update tests and configs to reflect the always-on plan tool and guard
workspace restriction tests against env leakage
## Testing
Manually tested the extension.
------
https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_i_68f67a3ff2d083209562a773f814c1f9
Add proper feature flag instead of having custom flags for everything.
This is just for experimental/wip part of the code
It can be used through CLI:
```bash
codex --enable unified_exec --disable view_image_tool
```
Or in the `config.toml`
```toml
# Global toggles applied to every profile unless overridden.
[features]
apply_patch_freeform = true
view_image_tool = false
```
Follow-up:
In a following PR, the goal is to have a default have `bundles` of
features that we can associate to a model
