Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Bolin
d9dbf48828 fix: separate codex mcp into codex mcp-server and codex app-server (#4471)
This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes.

Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish
server that had two overlapping responsibilities:

- Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls.
- Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code
extension.

This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts:

- `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server
- `codex app-server` for the "application server"

Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands
for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.)

The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the
refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder.
Note that most of the existing integration tests in
`codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so
all the tests have been moved with the exception of
`codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`.

Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I
had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses
the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings
to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs.

While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality
(like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types)
and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up
doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat
similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now,
though I expect them to diverge more in the near future.

One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex
app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake.
Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an
`Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo`
object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in
`codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`.

One other material change is in
`codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated
a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying
to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a
`JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which
takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of
all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this
update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`,
`SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the
old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next
release that contains this PR. Note that
`codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update
to reflect this change.

I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility
crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and
`app-server`.
2025-09-30 07:06:18 +00:00
Dylan
197f45a3be [mcp-server] Expose fuzzy file search in MCP (#2677)
## Summary
Expose a simple fuzzy file search implementation for mcp clients to work
with

## Testing
- [x] Tested locally
2025-09-29 12:19:09 -07:00
Michael Bolin
c172e8e997 feat: added SetDefaultModel to JSON-RPC server (#3512)
This adds `SetDefaultModel`, which takes `model` and `reasoning_effort`
as optional fields. If set, the field will overwrite what is in the
user's `config.toml`.

This reuses logic that was added to support the `/model` command in the
TUI: https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/2799.
2025-09-11 23:44:17 -07:00
Michael Bolin
65f3528cad feat: add UserInfo request to JSON-RPC server (#3428)
This adds a simple endpoint that provides the email address encoded in
`$CODEX_HOME/auth.json`.

As noted, for now, we do not hit the server to verify this is the user's
true email address.
2025-09-10 17:03:35 -07:00
Michael Bolin
ace14e8d36 feat: add ArchiveConversation to ClientRequest (#3353)
Adds support for `ArchiveConversation` in the JSON-RPC server that takes
a `(ConversationId, PathBuf)` pair and:

- verifies the `ConversationId` corresponds to the rollout id at the
`PathBuf`
- if so, invokes
`ConversationManager.remove_conversation(ConversationId)`
- if the `CodexConversation` was in memory, send `Shutdown` and wait for
`ShutdownComplete` with a timeout
- moves the `.jsonl` file to `$CODEX_HOME/archived_sessions`

---------

Co-authored-by: Gabriel Peal <gabriel@openai.com>
2025-09-09 11:39:00 -04:00
Gabriel Peal
5c1416d99b Add a getUserAgent MCP method (#3320)
This will allow the extension to pass this user agent + a suffix for its
requests
2025-09-08 13:30:13 -04:00
Ahmed Ibrahim
907d3dd348 MCP: add session resume + history listing; (#3185)
# External (non-OpenAI) Pull Request Requirements

Before opening this Pull Request, please read the dedicated
"Contributing" markdown file or your PR may be closed:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/contributing.md

If your PR conforms to our contribution guidelines, replace this text
with a detailed and high quality description of your changes.
2025-09-04 23:44:18 +00:00
Dylan
0cec0770e2 [mcp-server] Add GetConfig endpoint (#2725)
## Summary
Adds a GetConfig request to the MCP Protocol, so MCP clients can
evaluate the resolved config.toml settings which the harness is using.

## Testing
- [x] Added an end to end test of the endpoint
2025-08-27 09:59:03 -07:00
Jeremy Rose
32bbbbad61 test: faster test execution in codex-core (#2633)
this dramatically improves time to run `cargo test -p codex-core` (~25x
speedup).

before:
```
cargo test -p codex-core  35.96s user 68.63s system 19% cpu 8:49.80 total
```

after:
```
cargo test -p codex-core  5.51s user 8.16s system 63% cpu 21.407 total
```

both tests measured "hot", i.e. on a 2nd run with no filesystem changes,
to exclude compile times.

approach inspired by [Delete Cargo Integration
Tests](https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html),
we move all test cases in tests/ into a single suite in order to have a
single binary, as there is significant overhead for each test binary
executed, and because test execution is only parallelized with a single
binary.
2025-08-24 11:10:53 -07:00