feat: introduce codex_execpolicy crate for defining "safe" commands (#634)
As described in detail in `codex-rs/execpolicy/README.md` introduced in
this PR, `execpolicy` is a tool that lets you define a set of _patterns_
used to match [`execv(3)`](https://linux.die.net/man/3/execv)
invocations. When a pattern is matched, `execpolicy` returns the parsed
version in a structured form that is amenable to static analysis.
The primary use case is to define patterns match commands that should be
auto-approved by a tool such as Codex. This supports a richer pattern
matching mechanism that the sort of prefix-matching we have done to
date, e.g.:
5e40d9d221/codex-cli/src/approvals.ts (L333-L354)
Note we are still playing with the API and the `system_path` option in
particular still needs some work.
This commit is contained in:
85
codex-rs/execpolicy/tests/pwd.rs
Normal file
85
codex-rs/execpolicy/tests/pwd.rs
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
|
||||
extern crate codex_execpolicy;
|
||||
|
||||
use std::vec;
|
||||
|
||||
use codex_execpolicy::get_default_policy;
|
||||
use codex_execpolicy::Error;
|
||||
use codex_execpolicy::ExecCall;
|
||||
use codex_execpolicy::MatchedExec;
|
||||
use codex_execpolicy::MatchedFlag;
|
||||
use codex_execpolicy::Policy;
|
||||
use codex_execpolicy::PositionalArg;
|
||||
use codex_execpolicy::ValidExec;
|
||||
|
||||
fn setup() -> Policy {
|
||||
get_default_policy().expect("failed to load default policy")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_pwd_no_args() {
|
||||
let policy = setup();
|
||||
let pwd = ExecCall::new("pwd", &[]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Ok(MatchedExec::Match {
|
||||
exec: ValidExec {
|
||||
program: "pwd".into(),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}),
|
||||
policy.check(&pwd)
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_pwd_capital_l() {
|
||||
let policy = setup();
|
||||
let pwd = ExecCall::new("pwd", &["-L"]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Ok(MatchedExec::Match {
|
||||
exec: ValidExec {
|
||||
program: "pwd".into(),
|
||||
flags: vec![MatchedFlag::new("-L")],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}),
|
||||
policy.check(&pwd)
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_pwd_capital_p() {
|
||||
let policy = setup();
|
||||
let pwd = ExecCall::new("pwd", &["-P"]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Ok(MatchedExec::Match {
|
||||
exec: ValidExec {
|
||||
program: "pwd".into(),
|
||||
flags: vec![MatchedFlag::new("-P")],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}),
|
||||
policy.check(&pwd)
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_pwd_extra_args() {
|
||||
let policy = setup();
|
||||
let pwd = ExecCall::new("pwd", &["foo", "bar"]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Err(Error::UnexpectedArguments {
|
||||
program: "pwd".to_string(),
|
||||
args: vec![
|
||||
PositionalArg {
|
||||
index: 0,
|
||||
value: "foo".to_string()
|
||||
},
|
||||
PositionalArg {
|
||||
index: 1,
|
||||
value: "bar".to_string()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
policy.check(&pwd)
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user