feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
//! Root of the `codex-core` library.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Prevent accidental direct writes to stdout/stderr in library code. All
|
2025-05-15 00:30:13 -07:00
|
|
|
// user-visible output must go through the appropriate abstraction (e.g.,
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
// the TUI or the tracing stack).
|
|
|
|
|
#![deny(clippy::print_stdout, clippy::print_stderr)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-07-28 09:51:22 -07:00
|
|
|
mod apply_patch;
|
feat: expand the set of commands that can be safely identified as "trusted" (#1668)
This PR updates `is_known_safe_command()` to account for "safe
operators" to expand the set of commands that can be run without
approval. This concept existed in the TypeScript CLI, and we are
[finally!] porting it to the Rust one:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/c9e2def49487585cfe6f8bb7b2be442e8c0b5e1b/codex-cli/src/approvals.ts#L531-L541
The idea is that if we have `EXPR1 SAFE_OP EXPR2` and `EXPR1` and
`EXPR2` are considered safe independently, then `EXPR1 SAFE_OP EXPR2`
should be considered safe. Currently, `SAFE_OP` includes `&&`, `||`,
`;`, and `|`.
In the TypeScript implementation, we relied on
https://www.npmjs.com/package/shell-quote to parse the string of Bash,
as it could provide a "lightweight" parse tree, parsing `'beep || boop >
/byte'` as:
```
[ 'beep', { op: '||' }, 'boop', { op: '>' }, '/byte' ]
```
Though in this PR, we introduce the use of
https://crates.io/crates/tree-sitter-bash for parsing (which
incidentally we were already using in
[`codex-apply-patch`](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/c9e2def49487585cfe6f8bb7b2be442e8c0b5e1b/codex-rs/apply-patch/Cargo.toml#L18)),
which gives us a richer parse tree. (Incidentally, if you have never
played with tree-sitter, try the
[playground](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/7-playground.html)
and select **Bash** from the dropdown to see how it parses various
expressions.)
As a concrete example, prior to this change, our implementation of
`is_known_safe_command()` could verify things like:
```
["bash", "-lc", "grep -R \"Cargo.toml\" -n"]
```
but not:
```
["bash", "-lc", "grep -R \"Cargo.toml\" -n || true"]
```
With this change, the version with `|| true` is also accepted.
Admittedly, this PR does not expand the safety check to support
subshells, so it would reject, e.g. `bash -lc 'ls || (pwd && echo hi)'`,
but that can be addressed in a subsequent PR.
2025-07-24 14:13:30 -07:00
|
|
|
mod bash;
|
2025-05-08 21:46:06 -07:00
|
|
|
mod chat_completions;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
mod client;
|
2025-05-08 21:46:06 -07:00
|
|
|
mod client_common;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod codex;
|
2025-05-07 17:38:28 -07:00
|
|
|
pub use codex::Codex;
|
2025-07-27 20:01:35 -07:00
|
|
|
pub use codex::CodexSpawnOk;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod codex_wrapper;
|
|
|
|
|
pub mod config;
|
2025-05-13 16:52:52 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod config_profile;
|
2025-05-20 11:55:25 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod config_types;
|
2025-05-08 21:46:06 -07:00
|
|
|
mod conversation_history;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod error;
|
|
|
|
|
pub mod exec;
|
feat: introduce support for shell_environment_policy in config.toml (#1061)
To date, when handling `shell` and `local_shell` tool calls, we were
spawning new processes using the environment inherited from the Codex
process itself. This means that the sensitive `OPENAI_API_KEY` that
Codex needs to talk to OpenAI models was made available to everything
run by `shell` and `local_shell`. While there are cases where that might
be useful, it does not seem like a good default.
This PR introduces a complex `shell_environment_policy` config option to
control the `env` used with these tool calls. It is inevitably a bit
complex so that it is possible to override individual components of the
policy so without having to restate the entire thing.
Details are in the updated `README.md` in this PR, but here is the
relevant bit that explains the individual fields of
`shell_environment_policy`:
| Field | Type | Default | Description |
| ------------------------- | -------------------------- | ------- |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| `inherit` | string | `core` | Starting template for the
environment:<br>`core` (`HOME`, `PATH`, `USER`, …), `all` (clone full
parent env), or `none` (start empty). |
| `ignore_default_excludes` | boolean | `false` | When `false`, Codex
removes any var whose **name** contains `KEY`, `SECRET`, or `TOKEN`
(case-insensitive) before other rules run. |
| `exclude` | array<string> | `[]` | Case-insensitive glob
patterns to drop after the default filter.<br>Examples: `"AWS_*"`,
`"AZURE_*"`. |
| `set` | table<string,string> | `{}` | Explicit key/value
overrides or additions – always win over inherited values. |
| `include_only` | array<string> | `[]` | If non-empty, a
whitelist of patterns; only variables that match _one_ pattern survive
the final step. (Generally used with `inherit = "all"`.) |
In particular, note that the default is `inherit = "core"`, so:
* if you have extra env variables that you want to inherit from the
parent process, use `inherit = "all"` and then specify `include_only`
* if you have extra env variables where you want to hardcode the values,
the default `inherit = "core"` will work fine, but then you need to
specify `set`
This configuration is not battle-tested, so we will probably still have
to play with it a bit. `core/src/exec_env.rs` has the critical business
logic as well as unit tests.
Though if nothing else, previous to this change:
```
$ cargo run --bin codex -- debug seatbelt -- printenv OPENAI_API_KEY
# ...prints OPENAI_API_KEY...
```
But after this change it does not print anything (as desired).
One final thing to call out about this PR is that the
`configure_command!` macro we use in `core/src/exec.rs` has to do some
complex logic with respect to how it builds up the `env` for the process
being spawned under Landlock/seccomp. Specifically, doing
`cmd.env_clear()` followed by `cmd.envs(&$env_map)` (which is arguably
the most intuitive way to do it) caused the Landlock unit tests to fail
because the processes spawned by the unit tests started failing in
unexpected ways! If we forgo `env_clear()` in favor of updating env vars
one at a time, the tests still pass. The comment in the code talks about
this a bit, and while I would like to investigate this more, I need to
move on for the moment, but I do plan to come back to it to fully
understand what is going on. For example, this suggests that we might
not be able to spawn a C program that calls `env_clear()`, which would
be...weird. We may still have to fiddle with our Landlock config if that
is the case.
2025-05-22 09:51:19 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod exec_env;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
mod flags;
|
2025-07-24 19:35:28 +01:00
|
|
|
pub mod git_info;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
mod is_safe_command;
|
feat: support mcp_servers in config.toml (#829)
This adds initial support for MCP servers in the style of Claude Desktop
and Cursor. Note this PR is the bare minimum to get things working end
to end: all configured MCP servers are launched every time Codex is run,
there is no recovery for MCP servers that crash, etc.
(Also, I took some shortcuts to change some fields of `Session` to be
`pub(crate)`, which also means there are circular deps between
`codex.rs` and `mcp_tool_call.rs`, but I will clean that up in a
subsequent PR.)
`codex-rs/README.md` is updated as part of this PR to explain how to use
this feature. There is a bit of plumbing to route the new settings from
`Config` to the business logic in `codex.rs`. The most significant
chunks for new code are in `mcp_connection_manager.rs` (which defines
the `McpConnectionManager` struct) and `mcp_tool_call.rs`, which is
responsible for tool calls.
This PR also introduces new `McpToolCallBegin` and `McpToolCallEnd`
event types to the protocol, but does not add any handlers for them.
(See https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/836 for initial usage.)
To test, I added the following to my `~/.codex/config.toml`:
```toml
# Local build of https://github.com/hideya/mcp-server-weather-js
[mcp_servers.weather]
command = "/Users/mbolin/code/mcp-server-weather-js/dist/index.js"
args = []
```
And then I ran the following:
```
codex-rs$ cargo run --bin codex exec 'what is the weather in san francisco'
[2025-05-06T22:40:05] Task started: 1
[2025-05-06T22:40:18] Agent message: Here’s the latest National Weather Service forecast for San Francisco (downtown, near 37.77° N, 122.42° W):
This Afternoon (Tue):
• Sunny, high near 69 °F
• West-southwest wind around 12 mph
Tonight:
• Partly cloudy, low around 52 °F
• SW wind 7–10 mph
...
```
Note that Codex itself is not able to make network calls, so it would
not normally be able to get live weather information like this. However,
the weather MCP is [currently] not run under the Codex sandbox, so it is
able to hit `api.weather.gov` and fetch current weather information.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/829).
* #836
* __->__ #829
2025-05-06 15:47:59 -07:00
|
|
|
mod mcp_connection_manager;
|
|
|
|
|
mod mcp_tool_call;
|
feat: record messages from user in ~/.codex/history.jsonl (#939)
This is a large change to support a "history" feature like you would
expect in a shell like Bash.
History events are recorded in `$CODEX_HOME/history.jsonl`. Because it
is a JSONL file, it is straightforward to append new entries (as opposed
to the TypeScript file that uses `$CODEX_HOME/history.json`, so to be
valid JSON, each new entry entails rewriting the entire file). Because
it is possible for there to be multiple instances of Codex CLI writing
to `history.jsonl` at once, we use advisory file locking when working
with `history.jsonl` in `codex-rs/core/src/message_history.rs`.
Because we believe history is a sufficiently useful feature, we enable
it by default. Though to provide some safety, we set the file
permissions of `history.jsonl` to be `o600` so that other users on the
system cannot read the user's history. We do not yet support a default
list of `SENSITIVE_PATTERNS` as the TypeScript CLI does:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/3fdf9df1335ac9501e3fb0e61715359145711e8b/codex-cli/src/utils/storage/command-history.ts#L10-L17
We are going to take a more conservative approach to this list in the
Rust CLI. For example, while `/\b[A-Za-z0-9-_]{20,}\b/` might exclude
sensitive information like API tokens, it would also exclude valuable
information such as references to Git commits.
As noted in the updated documentation, users can opt-out of history by
adding the following to `config.toml`:
```toml
[history]
persistence = "none"
```
Because `history.jsonl` could, in theory, be quite large, we take a[n
arguably overly pedantic] approach in reading history entries into
memory. Specifically, we start by telling the client the current number
of entries in the history file (`history_entry_count`) as well as the
inode (`history_log_id`) of `history.jsonl` (see the new fields on
`SessionConfiguredEvent`).
The client is responsible for keeping new entries in memory to create a
"local history," but if the user hits up enough times to go "past" the
end of local history, then the client should use the new
`GetHistoryEntryRequest` in the protocol to fetch older entries.
Specifically, it should pass the `history_log_id` it was given
originally and work backwards from `history_entry_count`. (It should
really fetch history in batches rather than one-at-a-time, but that is
something we can improve upon in subsequent PRs.)
The motivation behind this crazy scheme is that it is designed to defend
against:
* The `history.jsonl` being truncated during the session such that the
index into the history is no longer consistent with what had been read
up to that point. We do not yet have logic to enforce a `max_bytes` for
`history.jsonl`, but once we do, we will aspire to implement it in a way
that should result in a new inode for the file on most systems.
* New items from concurrent Codex CLI sessions amending to the history.
Because, in absence of truncation, `history.jsonl` is an append-only
log, so long as the client reads backwards from `history_entry_count`,
it should always get a consistent view of history. (That said, it will
not be able to read _new_ commands from concurrent sessions, but perhaps
we will introduce a `/` command to reload latest history or something
down the road.)
Admittedly, my testing of this feature thus far has been fairly light. I
expect we will find bugs and introduce enhancements/fixes going forward.
2025-05-15 16:26:23 -07:00
|
|
|
mod message_history;
|
2025-05-07 17:38:28 -07:00
|
|
|
mod model_provider_info;
|
|
|
|
|
pub use model_provider_info::ModelProviderInfo;
|
2025-05-08 21:46:06 -07:00
|
|
|
pub use model_provider_info::WireApi;
|
2025-07-30 12:40:15 -07:00
|
|
|
pub use model_provider_info::built_in_model_providers;
|
2025-08-04 23:50:03 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod model_family;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
mod models;
|
feat: show number of tokens remaining in UI (#1388)
When using the OpenAI Responses API, we now record the `usage` field for
a `"response.completed"` event, which includes metrics about the number
of tokens consumed. We also introduce `openai_model_info.rs`, which
includes current data about the most common OpenAI models available via
the API (specifically `context_window` and `max_output_tokens`). If
Codex does not recognize the model, you can set `model_context_window`
and `model_max_output_tokens` explicitly in `config.toml`.
When then introduce a new event type to `protocol.rs`, `TokenCount`,
which includes the `TokenUsage` for the most recent turn.
Finally, we update the TUI to record the running sum of tokens used so
the percentage of available context window remaining can be reported via
the placeholder text for the composer:
We could certainly get much fancier with this (such as reporting the
estimated cost of the conversation), but for now, we are just trying to
achieve feature parity with the TypeScript CLI.
Though arguably this improves upon the TypeScript CLI, as the TypeScript
CLI uses heuristics to estimate the number of tokens used rather than
using the `usage` information directly:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/296996d74e345b1b05d8c3451a06ace21c5ada96/codex-cli/src/utils/approximate-tokens-used.ts#L3-L16
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1242
2025-06-25 23:31:11 -07:00
|
|
|
mod openai_model_info;
|
2025-05-30 14:07:03 -07:00
|
|
|
mod openai_tools;
|
2025-07-29 11:22:02 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod plan_tool;
|
2025-05-10 17:52:59 -07:00
|
|
|
mod project_doc;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod protocol;
|
2025-05-07 13:49:15 -07:00
|
|
|
mod rollout;
|
2025-08-03 13:05:48 -07:00
|
|
|
pub(crate) mod safety;
|
2025-07-31 13:11:47 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod seatbelt;
|
2025-07-25 11:45:23 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod shell;
|
2025-07-31 13:11:47 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod spawn;
|
2025-08-04 08:57:04 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod turn_diff_tracker;
|
feat: configurable notifications in the Rust CLI (#793)
With this change, you can specify a program that will be executed to get
notified about events generated by Codex. The notification info will be
packaged as a JSON object. The supported notification types are defined
by the `UserNotification` enum introduced in this PR. Initially, it
contains only one variant, `AgentTurnComplete`:
```rust
pub(crate) enum UserNotification {
#[serde(rename_all = "kebab-case")]
AgentTurnComplete {
turn_id: String,
/// Messages that the user sent to the agent to initiate the turn.
input_messages: Vec<String>,
/// The last message sent by the assistant in the turn.
last_assistant_message: Option<String>,
},
}
```
This is intended to support the common case when a "turn" ends, which
often means it is now your chance to give Codex further instructions.
For example, I have the following in my `~/.codex/config.toml`:
```toml
notify = ["python3", "/Users/mbolin/.codex/notify.py"]
```
I created my own custom notifier script that calls out to
[terminal-notifier](https://github.com/julienXX/terminal-notifier) to
show a desktop push notification on macOS. Contents of `notify.py`:
```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import json
import subprocess
import sys
def main() -> int:
if len(sys.argv) != 2:
print("Usage: notify.py <NOTIFICATION_JSON>")
return 1
try:
notification = json.loads(sys.argv[1])
except json.JSONDecodeError:
return 1
match notification_type := notification.get("type"):
case "agent-turn-complete":
assistant_message = notification.get("last-assistant-message")
if assistant_message:
title = f"Codex: {assistant_message}"
else:
title = "Codex: Turn Complete!"
input_messages = notification.get("input_messages", [])
message = " ".join(input_messages)
title += message
case _:
print(f"not sending a push notification for: {notification_type}")
return 0
subprocess.check_output(
[
"terminal-notifier",
"-title",
title,
"-message",
message,
"-group",
"codex",
"-ignoreDnD",
"-activate",
"com.googlecode.iterm2",
]
)
return 0
if __name__ == "__main__":
sys.exit(main())
```
For reference, here are related PRs that tried to add this functionality
to the TypeScript version of the Codex CLI:
* https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/160
* https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/498
2025-05-02 19:48:13 -07:00
|
|
|
mod user_notification;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
pub mod util;
|
feat: make reasoning effort/summaries configurable (#1199)
Previous to this PR, we always set `reasoning` when making a request
using the Responses API:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/d7245cbbc9d8ff5446da45e5951761103492476d/codex-rs/core/src/client.rs#L108-L111
Though if you tried to use the Rust CLI with `--model gpt-4.1`, this
would fail with:
```shell
"Unsupported parameter: 'reasoning.effort' is not supported with this model."
```
We take a cue from the TypeScript CLI, which does a check on the model
name:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/d7245cbbc9d8ff5446da45e5951761103492476d/codex-cli/src/utils/agent/agent-loop.ts#L786-L789
This PR does a similar check, though also adds support for the following
config options:
```
model_reasoning_effort = "low" | "medium" | "high" | "none"
model_reasoning_summary = "auto" | "concise" | "detailed" | "none"
```
This way, if you have a model whose name happens to start with `"o"` (or
`"codex"`?), you can set these to `"none"` to explicitly disable
reasoning, if necessary. (That said, it seems unlikely anyone would use
the Responses API with non-OpenAI models, but we provide an escape
hatch, anyway.)
This PR also updates both the TUI and `codex exec` to show `reasoning
effort` and `reasoning summaries` in the header.
2025-06-02 16:01:34 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fix: run apply_patch calls through the sandbox (#1705)
Building on the work of https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/1702, this
changes how a shell call to `apply_patch` is handled.
Previously, a shell call to `apply_patch` was always handled in-process,
never leveraging a sandbox. To determine whether the `apply_patch`
operation could be auto-approved, the
`is_write_patch_constrained_to_writable_paths()` function would check if
all the paths listed in the paths were writable. If so, the agent would
apply the changes listed in the patch.
Unfortunately, this approach afforded a loophole: symlinks!
* For a soft link, we could fix this issue by tracing the link and
checking whether the target is in the set of writable paths, however...
* ...For a hard link, things are not as simple. We can run `stat FILE`
to see if the number of links is greater than 1, but then we would have
to do something potentially expensive like `find . -inum <inode_number>`
to find the other paths for `FILE`. Further, even if this worked, this
approach runs the risk of a
[TOCTOU](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-of-check_to_time-of-use)
race condition, so it is not robust.
The solution, implemented in this PR, is to take the virtual execution
of the `apply_patch` CLI into an _actual_ execution using `codex
--codex-run-as-apply-patch PATCH`, which we can run under the sandbox
the user specified, just like any other `shell` call.
This, of course, assumes that the sandbox prevents writing through
symlinks as a mechanism to write to folders that are not in the writable
set configured by the sandbox. I verified this by testing the following
on both Mac and Linux:
```shell
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
# Can running a command in SANDBOX_DIR write a file in EXPLOIT_DIR?
# Codex is run in SANDBOX_DIR, so writes should be constrianed to this directory.
SANDBOX_DIR=$(mktemp -d -p "$HOME" sandboxtesttemp.XXXXXX)
# EXPLOIT_DIR is outside of SANDBOX_DIR, so let's see if we can write to it.
EXPLOIT_DIR=$(mktemp -d -p "$HOME" sandboxtesttemp.XXXXXX)
echo "SANDBOX_DIR: $SANDBOX_DIR"
echo "EXPLOIT_DIR: $EXPLOIT_DIR"
cleanup() {
# Only remove if it looks sane and still exists
[[ -n "${SANDBOX_DIR:-}" && -d "$SANDBOX_DIR" ]] && rm -rf -- "$SANDBOX_DIR"
[[ -n "${EXPLOIT_DIR:-}" && -d "$EXPLOIT_DIR" ]] && rm -rf -- "$EXPLOIT_DIR"
}
trap cleanup EXIT
echo "I am the original content" > "${EXPLOIT_DIR}/original.txt"
# Drop the -s to test hard links.
ln -s "${EXPLOIT_DIR}/original.txt" "${SANDBOX_DIR}/link-to-original.txt"
cat "${SANDBOX_DIR}/link-to-original.txt"
if [[ "$(uname)" == "Linux" ]]; then
SANDBOX_SUBCOMMAND=landlock
else
SANDBOX_SUBCOMMAND=seatbelt
fi
# Attempt the exploit
cd "${SANDBOX_DIR}"
codex debug "${SANDBOX_SUBCOMMAND}" bash -lc "echo pwned > ./link-to-original.txt" || true
cat "${EXPLOIT_DIR}/original.txt"
```
Admittedly, this change merits a proper integration test, but I think I
will have to do that in a follow-up PR.
2025-07-30 16:45:08 -07:00
|
|
|
pub use apply_patch::CODEX_APPLY_PATCH_ARG1;
|
2025-08-03 13:05:48 -07:00
|
|
|
pub use safety::get_platform_sandbox;
|
