Files
llmx/codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol.rs

944 lines
32 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::path::PathBuf;
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
use crate::JSONRPCNotification;
use crate::JSONRPCRequest;
use crate::RequestId;
use codex_protocol::ConversationId;
use codex_protocol::config_types::ReasoningEffort;
use codex_protocol::config_types::ReasoningSummary;
use codex_protocol::config_types::SandboxMode;
use codex_protocol::config_types::Verbosity;
use codex_protocol::parse_command::ParsedCommand;
use codex_protocol::protocol::AskForApproval;
use codex_protocol::protocol::EventMsg;
use codex_protocol::protocol::FileChange;
use codex_protocol::protocol::ReviewDecision;
use codex_protocol::protocol::SandboxPolicy;
use codex_protocol::protocol::TurnAbortReason;
use paste::paste;
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
use serde::Deserialize;
use serde::Serialize;
use strum_macros::Display;
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
use ts_rs::TS;
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
use uuid::Uuid;
2025-08-19 19:50:28 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, TS)]
#[ts(type = "string")]
pub struct GitSha(pub String);
impl GitSha {
pub fn new(sha: &str) -> Self {
Self(sha.to_string())
}
}
OpenTelemetry events (#2103) ### Title ## otel Codex can emit [OpenTelemetry](https://opentelemetry.io/) **log events** that describe each run: outbound API requests, streamed responses, user input, tool-approval decisions, and the result of every tool invocation. Export is **disabled by default** so local runs remain self-contained. Opt in by adding an `[otel]` table and choosing an exporter. ```toml [otel] environment = "staging" # defaults to "dev" exporter = "none" # defaults to "none"; set to otlp-http or otlp-grpc to send events log_user_prompt = false # defaults to false; redact prompt text unless explicitly enabled ``` Codex tags every exported event with `service.name = "codex-cli"`, the CLI version, and an `env` attribute so downstream collectors can distinguish dev/staging/prod traffic. Only telemetry produced inside the `codex_otel` crate—the events listed below—is forwarded to the exporter. ### Event catalog Every event shares a common set of metadata fields: `event.timestamp`, `conversation.id`, `app.version`, `auth_mode` (when available), `user.account_id` (when available), `terminal.type`, `model`, and `slug`. With OTEL enabled Codex emits the following event types (in addition to the metadata above): - `codex.api_request` - `cf_ray` (optional) - `attempt` - `duration_ms` - `http.response.status_code` (optional) - `error.message` (failures) - `codex.sse_event` - `event.kind` - `duration_ms` - `error.message` (failures) - `input_token_count` (completion only) - `output_token_count` (completion only) - `cached_token_count` (completion only, optional) - `reasoning_token_count` (completion only, optional) - `tool_token_count` (completion only) - `codex.user_prompt` - `prompt_length` - `prompt` (redacted unless `log_user_prompt = true`) - `codex.tool_decision` - `tool_name` - `call_id` - `decision` (`approved`, `approved_for_session`, `denied`, or `abort`) - `source` (`config` or `user`) - `codex.tool_result` - `tool_name` - `call_id` - `arguments` - `duration_ms` (execution time for the tool) - `success` (`"true"` or `"false"`) - `output` ### Choosing an exporter Set `otel.exporter` to control where events go: - `none` – leaves instrumentation active but skips exporting. This is the default. - `otlp-http` – posts OTLP log records to an OTLP/HTTP collector. Specify the endpoint, protocol, and headers your collector expects: ```toml [otel] exporter = { otlp-http = { endpoint = "https://otel.example.com/v1/logs", protocol = "binary", headers = { "x-otlp-api-key" = "${OTLP_TOKEN}" } }} ``` - `otlp-grpc` – streams OTLP log records over gRPC. Provide the endpoint and any metadata headers: ```toml [otel] exporter = { otlp-grpc = { endpoint = "https://otel.example.com:4317", headers = { "x-otlp-meta" = "abc123" } }} ``` If the exporter is `none` nothing is written anywhere; otherwise you must run or point to your own collector. All exporters run on a background batch worker that is flushed on shutdown. If you build Codex from source the OTEL crate is still behind an `otel` feature flag; the official prebuilt binaries ship with the feature enabled. When the feature is disabled the telemetry hooks become no-ops so the CLI continues to function without the extra dependencies. --------- Co-authored-by: Anton Panasenko <apanasenko@openai.com>
2025-09-29 19:30:55 +01:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Display, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "lowercase")]
pub enum AuthMode {
ApiKey,
ChatGPT,
}
/// Generates an `enum ClientRequest` where each variant is a request that the
/// client can send to the server. Each variant has associated `params` and
/// `response` types. Also generates a `export_client_responses()` function to
/// export all response types to TypeScript.
macro_rules! client_request_definitions {
(
$(
$(#[$variant_meta:meta])*
$variant:ident {
params: $(#[$params_meta:meta])* $params:ty,
response: $response:ty,
}
),* $(,)?
) => {
/// Request from the client to the server.
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(tag = "method", rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub enum ClientRequest {
$(
$(#[$variant_meta])*
$variant {
#[serde(rename = "id")]
request_id: RequestId,
$(#[$params_meta])*
params: $params,
},
)*
}
pub fn export_client_responses(
out_dir: &::std::path::Path,
) -> ::std::result::Result<(), ::ts_rs::ExportError> {
$(
<$response as ::ts_rs::TS>::export_all_to(out_dir)?;
)*
Ok(())
}
};
}
client_request_definitions! {
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
Initialize {
params: InitializeParams,
response: InitializeResponse,
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
},
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
NewConversation {
params: NewConversationParams,
response: NewConversationResponse,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
},
/// List recorded Codex conversations (rollouts) with optional pagination and search.
ListConversations {
params: ListConversationsParams,
response: ListConversationsResponse,
},
/// Resume a recorded Codex conversation from a rollout file.
ResumeConversation {
params: ResumeConversationParams,
response: ResumeConversationResponse,
},
ArchiveConversation {
params: ArchiveConversationParams,
response: ArchiveConversationResponse,
},
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
SendUserMessage {
params: SendUserMessageParams,
response: SendUserMessageResponse,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
},
SendUserTurn {
params: SendUserTurnParams,
response: SendUserTurnResponse,
},
InterruptConversation {
params: InterruptConversationParams,
response: InterruptConversationResponse,
},
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
AddConversationListener {
params: AddConversationListenerParams,
response: AddConversationSubscriptionResponse,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
},
RemoveConversationListener {
params: RemoveConversationListenerParams,
response: RemoveConversationSubscriptionResponse,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
},
GitDiffToRemote {
params: GitDiffToRemoteParams,
response: GitDiffToRemoteResponse,
},
LoginApiKey {
params: LoginApiKeyParams,
response: LoginApiKeyResponse,
},
LoginChatGpt {
params: #[ts(type = "undefined")] #[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")] Option<()>,
response: LoginChatGptResponse,
},
CancelLoginChatGpt {
params: CancelLoginChatGptParams,
response: CancelLoginChatGptResponse,
},
LogoutChatGpt {
params: #[ts(type = "undefined")] #[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")] Option<()>,
response: LogoutChatGptResponse,
},
GetAuthStatus {
params: GetAuthStatusParams,
response: GetAuthStatusResponse,
2025-08-19 19:50:28 -07:00
},
GetUserSavedConfig {
params: #[ts(type = "undefined")] #[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")] Option<()>,
response: GetUserSavedConfigResponse,
},
SetDefaultModel {
params: SetDefaultModelParams,
response: SetDefaultModelResponse,
},
GetUserAgent {
params: #[ts(type = "undefined")] #[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")] Option<()>,
response: GetUserAgentResponse,
},
UserInfo {
params: #[ts(type = "undefined")] #[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")] Option<()>,
response: UserInfoResponse,
},
FuzzyFileSearch {
params: FuzzyFileSearchParams,
response: FuzzyFileSearchResponse,
},
/// Execute a command (argv vector) under the server's sandbox.
ExecOneOffCommand {
params: ExecOneOffCommandParams,
response: ExecOneOffCommandResponse,
},
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
}
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Default, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct InitializeParams {
pub client_info: ClientInfo,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Default, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ClientInfo {
pub name: String,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub title: Option<String>,
pub version: String,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct InitializeResponse {
pub user_agent: String,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Default, TS)]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct NewConversationParams {
/// Optional override for the model name (e.g. "o3", "o4-mini").
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub model: Option<String>,
/// Configuration profile from config.toml to specify default options.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub profile: Option<String>,
/// Working directory for the session. If relative, it is resolved against
/// the server process's current working directory.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub cwd: Option<String>,
/// Approval policy for shell commands generated by the model:
/// `untrusted`, `on-failure`, `on-request`, `never`.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub approval_policy: Option<AskForApproval>,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
/// Sandbox mode: `read-only`, `workspace-write`, or `danger-full-access`.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub sandbox: Option<SandboxMode>,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
/// Individual config settings that will override what is in
/// CODEX_HOME/config.toml.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub config: Option<HashMap<String, serde_json::Value>>,
/// The set of instructions to use instead of the default ones.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub base_instructions: Option<String>,
/// Whether to include the plan tool in the conversation.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub include_plan_tool: Option<bool>,
/// Whether to include the apply patch tool in the conversation.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub include_apply_patch_tool: Option<bool>,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct NewConversationResponse {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
pub model: String,
/// Note this could be ignored by the model.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub reasoning_effort: Option<ReasoningEffort>,
pub rollout_path: PathBuf,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ResumeConversationResponse {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
pub model: String,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub initial_messages: Option<Vec<EventMsg>>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Default, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ListConversationsParams {
/// Optional page size; defaults to a reasonable server-side value.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub page_size: Option<usize>,
/// Opaque pagination cursor returned by a previous call.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub cursor: Option<String>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ConversationSummary {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
pub path: PathBuf,
pub preview: String,
/// RFC3339 timestamp string for the session start, if available.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub timestamp: Option<String>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ListConversationsResponse {
pub items: Vec<ConversationSummary>,
/// Opaque cursor to pass to the next call to continue after the last item.
/// if None, there are no more items to return.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub next_cursor: Option<String>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ResumeConversationParams {
/// Absolute path to the rollout JSONL file.
pub path: PathBuf,
/// Optional overrides to apply when spawning the resumed session.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub overrides: Option<NewConversationParams>,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct AddConversationSubscriptionResponse {
pub subscription_id: Uuid,
}
/// The [`ConversationId`] must match the `rollout_path`.
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ArchiveConversationParams {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
pub rollout_path: PathBuf,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ArchiveConversationResponse {}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct RemoveConversationSubscriptionResponse {}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct LoginApiKeyParams {
pub api_key: String,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct LoginApiKeyResponse {}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct LoginChatGptResponse {
pub login_id: Uuid,
/// URL the client should open in a browser to initiate the OAuth flow.
pub auth_url: String,
}
2025-08-19 19:50:28 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct GitDiffToRemoteResponse {
pub sha: GitSha,
pub diff: String,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct CancelLoginChatGptParams {
pub login_id: Uuid,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct GitDiffToRemoteParams {
pub cwd: PathBuf,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct CancelLoginChatGptResponse {}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct LogoutChatGptParams {}
2025-08-19 19:50:28 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct LogoutChatGptResponse {}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct GetAuthStatusParams {
/// If true, include the current auth token (if available) in the response.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub include_token: Option<bool>,
/// If true, attempt to refresh the token before returning status.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub refresh_token: Option<bool>,
2025-08-19 19:50:28 -07:00
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ExecOneOffCommandParams {
/// Command argv to execute.
pub command: Vec<String>,
/// Timeout of the command in milliseconds.
/// If not specified, a sensible default is used server-side.
pub timeout_ms: Option<u64>,
/// Optional working directory for the process. Defaults to server config cwd.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub cwd: Option<PathBuf>,
/// Optional explicit sandbox policy overriding the server default.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub sandbox_policy: Option<SandboxPolicy>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ExecOneOffCommandResponse {
pub exit_code: i32,
pub stdout: String,
pub stderr: String,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct GetAuthStatusResponse {
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub auth_method: Option<AuthMode>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub auth_token: Option<String>,
// Indicates that auth method must be valid to use the server.
// This can be false if using a custom provider that is configured
// with requires_openai_auth == false.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub requires_openai_auth: Option<bool>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct GetUserAgentResponse {
pub user_agent: String,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct UserInfoResponse {
/// Note: `alleged_user_email` is not currently verified. We read it from
/// the local auth.json, which the user could theoretically modify. In the
/// future, we may add logic to verify the email against the server before
/// returning it.
pub alleged_user_email: Option<String>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct GetUserSavedConfigResponse {
pub config: UserSavedConfig,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct SetDefaultModelParams {
/// If set to None, this means `model` should be cleared in config.toml.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub model: Option<String>,
/// If set to None, this means `model_reasoning_effort` should be cleared
/// in config.toml.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub reasoning_effort: Option<ReasoningEffort>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct SetDefaultModelResponse {}
/// UserSavedConfig contains a subset of the config. It is meant to expose mcp
/// client-configurable settings that can be specified in the NewConversation
/// and SendUserTurn requests.
#[derive(Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Serialize, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct UserSavedConfig {
/// Approvals
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub approval_policy: Option<AskForApproval>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub sandbox_mode: Option<SandboxMode>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub sandbox_settings: Option<SandboxSettings>,
/// Model-specific configuration
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub model: Option<String>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub model_reasoning_effort: Option<ReasoningEffort>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub model_reasoning_summary: Option<ReasoningSummary>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub model_verbosity: Option<Verbosity>,
/// Tools
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub tools: Option<Tools>,
/// Profiles
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub profile: Option<String>,
#[serde(default)]
pub profiles: HashMap<String, Profile>,
}
/// MCP representation of a [`codex_core::config_profile::ConfigProfile`].
#[derive(Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Serialize, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct Profile {
pub model: Option<String>,
/// The key in the `model_providers` map identifying the
/// [`ModelProviderInfo`] to use.
pub model_provider: Option<String>,
pub approval_policy: Option<AskForApproval>,
pub model_reasoning_effort: Option<ReasoningEffort>,
pub model_reasoning_summary: Option<ReasoningSummary>,
pub model_verbosity: Option<Verbosity>,
pub chatgpt_base_url: Option<String>,
}
/// MCP representation of a [`codex_core::config::ToolsToml`].
#[derive(Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Serialize, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct Tools {
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub web_search: Option<bool>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub view_image: Option<bool>,
}
/// MCP representation of a [`codex_core::config_types::SandboxWorkspaceWrite`].
#[derive(Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Serialize, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct SandboxSettings {
#[serde(default)]
pub writable_roots: Vec<PathBuf>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub network_access: Option<bool>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub exclude_tmpdir_env_var: Option<bool>,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub exclude_slash_tmp: Option<bool>,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct SendUserMessageParams {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
pub items: Vec<InputItem>,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct SendUserTurnParams {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
pub items: Vec<InputItem>,
pub cwd: PathBuf,
pub approval_policy: AskForApproval,
pub sandbox_policy: SandboxPolicy,
pub model: String,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub effort: Option<ReasoningEffort>,
pub summary: ReasoningSummary,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct SendUserTurnResponse {}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct InterruptConversationParams {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct InterruptConversationResponse {
pub abort_reason: TurnAbortReason,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct SendUserMessageResponse {}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct AddConversationListenerParams {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct RemoveConversationListenerParams {
pub subscription_id: Uuid,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
#[serde(tag = "type", content = "data")]
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
pub enum InputItem {
Text {
text: String,
},
/// Preencoded data: URI image.
Image {
image_url: String,
},
/// Local image path provided by the user. This will be converted to an
/// `Image` variant (base64 data URL) during request serialization.
LocalImage {
path: PathBuf,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
},
}
/// Generates an `enum ServerRequest` where each variant is a request that the
/// server can send to the client along with the corresponding params and
/// response types. It also generates helper types used by the app/server
/// infrastructure (payload enum, request constructor, and export helpers).
macro_rules! server_request_definitions {
(
$(
$(#[$variant_meta:meta])*
$variant:ident
),* $(,)?
) => {
paste! {
/// Request initiated from the server and sent to the client.
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(tag = "method", rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub enum ServerRequest {
$(
$(#[$variant_meta])*
$variant {
#[serde(rename = "id")]
request_id: RequestId,
params: [<$variant Params>],
},
)*
}
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)]
pub enum ServerRequestPayload {
$( $variant([<$variant Params>]), )*
}
impl ServerRequestPayload {
pub fn request_with_id(self, request_id: RequestId) -> ServerRequest {
match self {
$(Self::$variant(params) => ServerRequest::$variant { request_id, params },)*
}
}
}
}
pub fn export_server_responses(
out_dir: &::std::path::Path,
) -> ::std::result::Result<(), ::ts_rs::ExportError> {
paste! {
$(<[<$variant Response>] as ::ts_rs::TS>::export_all_to(out_dir)?;)*
}
Ok(())
}
};
}
impl TryFrom<JSONRPCRequest> for ServerRequest {
type Error = serde_json::Error;
fn try_from(value: JSONRPCRequest) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> {
serde_json::from_value(serde_json::to_value(value)?)
}
}
server_request_definitions! {
/// Request to approve a patch.
ApplyPatchApproval,
/// Request to exec a command.
ExecCommandApproval,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ApplyPatchApprovalParams {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
/// Use to correlate this with [codex_core::protocol::PatchApplyBeginEvent]
/// and [codex_core::protocol::PatchApplyEndEvent].
pub call_id: String,
pub file_changes: HashMap<PathBuf, FileChange>,
/// Optional explanatory reason (e.g. request for extra write access).
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub reason: Option<String>,
/// When set, the agent is asking the user to allow writes under this root
/// for the remainder of the session (unclear if this is honored today).
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub grant_root: Option<PathBuf>,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct ExecCommandApprovalParams {
pub conversation_id: ConversationId,
/// Use to correlate this with [codex_core::protocol::ExecCommandBeginEvent]
/// and [codex_core::protocol::ExecCommandEndEvent].
pub call_id: String,
pub command: Vec<String>,
pub cwd: PathBuf,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub reason: Option<String>,
pub parsed_cmd: Vec<ParsedCommand>,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
pub struct ExecCommandApprovalResponse {
pub decision: ReviewDecision,
}
2025-08-18 13:08:53 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
pub struct ApplyPatchApprovalResponse {
pub decision: ReviewDecision,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
#[ts(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct FuzzyFileSearchParams {
pub query: String,
pub roots: Vec<String>,
// if provided, will cancel any previous request that used the same value
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub cancellation_token: Option<String>,
}
/// Superset of [`codex_file_search::FileMatch`]
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
pub struct FuzzyFileSearchResult {
pub root: String,
pub path: String,
pub file_name: String,
pub score: u32,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub indices: Option<Vec<u32>>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
pub struct FuzzyFileSearchResponse {
pub files: Vec<FuzzyFileSearchResult>,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct LoginChatGptCompleteNotification {
pub login_id: Uuid,
pub success: bool,
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub error: Option<String>,
}
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct SessionConfiguredNotification {
/// Name left as session_id instead of conversation_id for backwards compatibility.
pub session_id: ConversationId,
/// Tell the client what model is being queried.
pub model: String,
/// The effort the model is putting into reasoning about the user's request.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub reasoning_effort: Option<ReasoningEffort>,
/// Identifier of the history log file (inode on Unix, 0 otherwise).
pub history_log_id: u64,
/// Current number of entries in the history log.
#[ts(type = "number")]
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
pub history_entry_count: usize,
/// Optional initial messages (as events) for resumed sessions.
/// When present, UIs can use these to seed the history.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub initial_messages: Option<Vec<EventMsg>>,
pub rollout_path: PathBuf,
}
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, PartialEq, TS)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct AuthStatusChangeNotification {
/// Current authentication method; omitted if signed out.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub auth_method: Option<AuthMode>,
}
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
/// Notification sent from the server to the client.
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, TS, Display)]
#[serde(tag = "method", content = "params", rename_all = "camelCase")]
#[strum(serialize_all = "camelCase")]
pub enum ServerNotification {
/// Authentication status changed
AuthStatusChange(AuthStatusChangeNotification),
/// ChatGPT login flow completed
LoginChatGptComplete(LoginChatGptCompleteNotification),
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
/// The special session configured event for a new or resumed conversation.
SessionConfigured(SessionConfiguredNotification),
}
impl ServerNotification {
pub fn to_params(self) -> Result<serde_json::Value, serde_json::Error> {
match self {
ServerNotification::AuthStatusChange(params) => serde_json::to_value(params),
ServerNotification::LoginChatGptComplete(params) => serde_json::to_value(params),
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
ServerNotification::SessionConfigured(params) => serde_json::to_value(params),
}
}
}
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
impl TryFrom<JSONRPCNotification> for ServerNotification {
type Error = serde_json::Error;
fn try_from(value: JSONRPCNotification) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> {
serde_json::from_value(serde_json::to_value(value)?)
}
}
/// Notification sent from the client to the server.
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone, TS, Display)]
#[serde(tag = "method", content = "params", rename_all = "camelCase")]
#[strum(serialize_all = "camelCase")]
pub enum ClientNotification {
Initialized,
}
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
use anyhow::Result;
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
use pretty_assertions::assert_eq;
use serde_json::json;
#[test]
fn serialize_new_conversation() -> Result<()> {
let request = ClientRequest::NewConversation {
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
request_id: RequestId::Integer(42),
params: NewConversationParams {
model: Some("gpt-5-codex".to_string()),
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
profile: None,
cwd: None,
approval_policy: Some(AskForApproval::OnRequest),
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
sandbox: None,
config: None,
base_instructions: None,
include_plan_tool: None,
include_apply_patch_tool: None,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
},
};
assert_eq!(
json!({
"method": "newConversation",
"id": 42,
"params": {
"model": "gpt-5-codex",
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
"approvalPolicy": "on-request"
}
}),
serde_json::to_value(&request)?,
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
);
Ok(())
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
}
#[test]
fn conversation_id_serializes_as_plain_string() -> Result<()> {
let id = ConversationId::from_string("67e55044-10b1-426f-9247-bb680e5fe0c8")?;
assert_eq!(
json!("67e55044-10b1-426f-9247-bb680e5fe0c8"),
serde_json::to_value(id)?
);
Ok(())
}
#[test]
fn conversation_id_deserializes_from_plain_string() -> Result<()> {
let id: ConversationId =
serde_json::from_value(json!("67e55044-10b1-426f-9247-bb680e5fe0c8"))?;
assert_eq!(
ConversationId::from_string("67e55044-10b1-426f-9247-bb680e5fe0c8")?,
id,
);
Ok(())
}
fix: separate `codex mcp` into `codex mcp-server` and `codex app-server` (#4471) This is a very large PR with some non-backwards-compatible changes. Historically, `codex mcp` (or `codex mcp serve`) started a JSON-RPC-ish server that had two overlapping responsibilities: - Running an MCP server, providing some basic tool calls. - Running the app server used to power experiences such as the VS Code extension. This PR aims to separate these into distinct concepts: - `codex mcp-server` for the MCP server - `codex app-server` for the "application server" Note `codex mcp` still exists because it already has its own subcommands for MCP management (`list`, `add`, etc.) The MCP logic continues to live in `codex-rs/mcp-server` whereas the refactored app server logic is in the new `codex-rs/app-server` folder. Note that most of the existing integration tests in `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite` were actually for the app server, so all the tests have been moved with the exception of `codex-rs/mcp-server/tests/suite/mod.rs`. Because this is already a large diff, I tried not to change more than I had to, so `codex-rs/app-server/tests/common/mcp_process.rs` still uses the name `McpProcess` for now, but I will do some mechanical renamings to things like `AppServer` in subsequent PRs. While `mcp-server` and `app-server` share some overlapping functionality (like reading streams of JSONL and dispatching based on message types) and some differences (completely different message types), I ended up doing a bit of copypasta between the two crates, as both have somewhat similar `message_processor.rs` and `outgoing_message.rs` files for now, though I expect them to diverge more in the near future. One material change is that of the initialize handshake for `codex app-server`, as we no longer use the MCP types for that handshake. Instead, we update `codex-rs/protocol/src/mcp_protocol.rs` to add an `Initialize` variant to `ClientRequest`, which takes the `ClientInfo` object we need to update the `USER_AGENT_SUFFIX` in `codex-rs/app-server/src/message_processor.rs`. One other material change is in `codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs` where I eliminated a use of the `send_event_as_notification()` method I am generally trying to deprecate (because it blindly maps an `EventMsg` into a `JSONNotification`) in favor of `send_server_notification()`, which takes a `ServerNotification`, as that is intended to be a custom enum of all notification types supported by the app server. So to make this update, I had to introduce a new variant of `ServerNotification`, `SessionConfigured`, which is a non-backwards compatible change with the old `codex mcp`, and clients will have to be updated after the next release that contains this PR. Note that `codex-rs/app-server/tests/suite/list_resume.rs` also had to be update to reflect this change. I introduced `codex-rs/utils/json-to-toml/src/lib.rs` as a small utility crate to avoid some of the copying between `mcp-server` and `app-server`.
2025-09-30 00:06:18 -07:00
#[test]
fn serialize_client_notification() -> Result<()> {
let notification = ClientNotification::Initialized;
// Note there is no "params" field for this notification.
assert_eq!(
json!({
"method": "initialized",
}),
serde_json::to_value(&notification)?,
);
Ok(())
}
#[test]
fn serialize_server_request() -> Result<()> {
let conversation_id = ConversationId::from_string("67e55044-10b1-426f-9247-bb680e5fe0c8")?;
let params = ExecCommandApprovalParams {
conversation_id,
call_id: "call-42".to_string(),
command: vec!["echo".to_string(), "hello".to_string()],
cwd: PathBuf::from("/tmp"),
reason: Some("because tests".to_string()),
parsed_cmd: vec![ParsedCommand::Unknown {
cmd: "echo hello".to_string(),
}],
};
let request = ServerRequest::ExecCommandApproval {
request_id: RequestId::Integer(7),
params: params.clone(),
};
assert_eq!(
json!({
"method": "execCommandApproval",
"id": 7,
"params": {
"conversationId": "67e55044-10b1-426f-9247-bb680e5fe0c8",
"callId": "call-42",
"command": ["echo", "hello"],
"cwd": "/tmp",
"reason": "because tests",
"parsedCmd": [
{
"type": "unknown",
"cmd": "echo hello"
}
]
}
}),
serde_json::to_value(&request)?,
);
let payload = ServerRequestPayload::ExecCommandApproval(params);
assert_eq!(payload.request_with_id(RequestId::Integer(7)), request);
Ok(())
}
feat: support traditional JSON-RPC request/response in MCP server (#2264) This introduces a new set of request types that our `codex mcp` supports. Note that these do not conform to MCP tool calls so that instead of having to send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "tools/call", "id": 42, "params": { "name": "newConversation", "arguments": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } } ``` we can send something like this: ```json { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "newConversation", "id": 42, "params": { "model": "gpt-5", "approvalPolicy": "on-request" } } ``` Admittedly, this new format is not a valid MCP tool call, but we are OK with that right now. (That is, not everything we might want to request of `codex mcp` is something that is appropriate for an autonomous agent to do.) To start, this introduces four request types: - `newConversation` - `sendUserMessage` - `addConversationListener` - `removeConversationListener` The new `mcp-server/tests/codex_message_processor_flow.rs` shows how these can be used. The types are defined on the `CodexRequest` enum, so we introduce a new `CodexMessageProcessor` that is responsible for dealing with requests from this enum. The top-level `MessageProcessor` has been updated so that when `process_request()` is called, it first checks whether the request conforms to `CodexRequest` and dispatches it to `CodexMessageProcessor` if so. Note that I also decided to use `camelCase` for the on-the-wire format, as that seems to be the convention for MCP. For the moment, the new protocol is defined in `wire_format.rs` within the `mcp-server` crate, but in a subsequent PR, I will probably move it to its own crate to ensure the protocol has minimal dependencies and that we can codegen a schema from it. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/2264). * #2278 * __->__ #2264
2025-08-13 17:36:29 -07:00
}