2025-05-04 11:12:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use std::path::PathBuf;
|
2025-05-07 08:37:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use std::sync::Arc;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::codex_wrapper::init_codex;
|
2025-04-27 21:47:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::config::Config;
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::AgentMessageEvent;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::AgentReasoningEvent;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::ApplyPatchApprovalRequestEvent;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::ErrorEvent;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::Event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::EventMsg;
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::ExecApprovalRequestEvent;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::ExecCommandBeginEvent;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::ExecCommandEndEvent;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::InputItem;
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::McpToolCallBeginEvent;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::McpToolCallEndEvent;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::Op;
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::PatchApplyBeginEvent;
|
2025-05-19 16:08:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::TaskCompleteEvent;
|
feat: show number of tokens remaining in UI (#1388)
When using the OpenAI Responses API, we now record the `usage` field for
a `"response.completed"` event, which includes metrics about the number
of tokens consumed. We also introduce `openai_model_info.rs`, which
includes current data about the most common OpenAI models available via
the API (specifically `context_window` and `max_output_tokens`). If
Codex does not recognize the model, you can set `model_context_window`
and `model_max_output_tokens` explicitly in `config.toml`.
When then introduce a new event type to `protocol.rs`, `TokenCount`,
which includes the `TokenUsage` for the most recent turn.
Finally, we update the TUI to record the running sum of tokens used so
the percentage of available context window remaining can be reported via
the placeholder text for the composer:

We could certainly get much fancier with this (such as reporting the
estimated cost of the conversation), but for now, we are just trying to
achieve feature parity with the TypeScript CLI.
Though arguably this improves upon the TypeScript CLI, as the TypeScript
CLI uses heuristics to estimate the number of tokens used rather than
using the `usage` information directly:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/296996d74e345b1b05d8c3451a06ace21c5ada96/codex-cli/src/utils/approximate-tokens-used.ts#L3-L16
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1242
2025-06-25 23:31:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_core::protocol::TokenUsage;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use crossterm::event::KeyEvent;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ratatui::buffer::Buffer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ratatui::layout::Constraint;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ratatui::layout::Direction;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ratatui::layout::Layout;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ratatui::layout::Rect;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ratatui::widgets::Widget;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ratatui::widgets::WidgetRef;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use tokio::sync::mpsc::UnboundedSender;
|
2025-05-07 08:37:48 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use tokio::sync::mpsc::unbounded_channel;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use crate::app_event::AppEvent;
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use crate::app_event_sender::AppEventSender;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use crate::bottom_pane::BottomPane;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use crate::bottom_pane::BottomPaneParams;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use crate::bottom_pane::InputResult;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use crate::conversation_history_widget::ConversationHistoryWidget;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use crate::history_cell::PatchEventType;
|
|
|
|
|
|
use crate::user_approval_widget::ApprovalRequest;
|
2025-06-28 15:04:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
use codex_file_search::FileMatch;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) struct ChatWidget<'a> {
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
app_event_tx: AppEventSender,
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
codex_op_tx: UnboundedSender<Op>,
|
|
|
|
|
|
conversation_history: ConversationHistoryWidget,
|
|
|
|
|
|
bottom_pane: BottomPane<'a>,
|
|
|
|
|
|
input_focus: InputFocus,
|
2025-04-27 21:47:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
config: Config,
|
2025-05-17 09:00:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
initial_user_message: Option<UserMessage>,
|
feat: show number of tokens remaining in UI (#1388)
When using the OpenAI Responses API, we now record the `usage` field for
a `"response.completed"` event, which includes metrics about the number
of tokens consumed. We also introduce `openai_model_info.rs`, which
includes current data about the most common OpenAI models available via
the API (specifically `context_window` and `max_output_tokens`). If
Codex does not recognize the model, you can set `model_context_window`
and `model_max_output_tokens` explicitly in `config.toml`.
When then introduce a new event type to `protocol.rs`, `TokenCount`,
which includes the `TokenUsage` for the most recent turn.
Finally, we update the TUI to record the running sum of tokens used so
the percentage of available context window remaining can be reported via
the placeholder text for the composer:

We could certainly get much fancier with this (such as reporting the
estimated cost of the conversation), but for now, we are just trying to
achieve feature parity with the TypeScript CLI.
Though arguably this improves upon the TypeScript CLI, as the TypeScript
CLI uses heuristics to estimate the number of tokens used rather than
using the `usage` information directly:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/296996d74e345b1b05d8c3451a06ace21c5ada96/codex-cli/src/utils/approximate-tokens-used.ts#L3-L16
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1242
2025-06-25 23:31:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
token_usage: TokenUsage,
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Eq, PartialEq)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
enum InputFocus {
|
|
|
|
|
|
HistoryPane,
|
|
|
|
|
|
BottomPane,
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-17 09:00:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
struct UserMessage {
|
|
|
|
|
|
text: String,
|
|
|
|
|
|
image_paths: Vec<PathBuf>,
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl From<String> for UserMessage {
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn from(text: String) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self {
|
|
|
|
|
|
text,
|
|
|
|
|
|
image_paths: Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn create_initial_user_message(text: String, image_paths: Vec<PathBuf>) -> Option<UserMessage> {
|
|
|
|
|
|
if text.is_empty() && image_paths.is_empty() {
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some(UserMessage { text, image_paths })
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
impl ChatWidget<'_> {
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) fn new(
|
2025-04-27 21:47:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
config: Config,
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
app_event_tx: AppEventSender,
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
initial_prompt: Option<String>,
|
2025-05-04 11:12:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
initial_images: Vec<PathBuf>,
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (codex_op_tx, mut codex_op_rx) = unbounded_channel::<Op>();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let app_event_tx_clone = app_event_tx.clone();
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the Codex asynchronously so the UI loads as quickly as possible.
|
2025-04-27 21:47:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
let config_for_agent_loop = config.clone();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
tokio::spawn(async move {
|
2025-04-28 15:39:34 -07:00
|
|
|
|
let (codex, session_event, _ctrl_c) = match init_codex(config_for_agent_loop).await {
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok(vals) => vals,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Err(e) => {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO: surface this error to the user.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tracing::error!("failed to initialize codex: {e}");
|
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Forward the captured `SessionInitialized` event that was consumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
// inside `init_codex()` so it can be rendered in the UI.
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
app_event_tx_clone.send(AppEvent::CodexEvent(session_event.clone()));
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
let codex = Arc::new(codex);
|
|
|
|
|
|
let codex_clone = codex.clone();
|
|
|
|
|
|
tokio::spawn(async move {
|
|
|
|
|
|
while let Some(op) = codex_op_rx.recv().await {
|
|
|
|
|
|
let id = codex_clone.submit(op).await;
|
|
|
|
|
|
if let Err(e) = id {
|
|
|
|
|
|
tracing::error!("failed to submit op: {e}");
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while let Ok(event) = codex.next_event().await {
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
app_event_tx_clone.send(AppEvent::CodexEvent(event));
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-17 09:00:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
Self {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
app_event_tx: app_event_tx.clone(),
|
|
|
|
|
|
codex_op_tx,
|
|
|
|
|
|
conversation_history: ConversationHistoryWidget::new(),
|
|
|
|
|
|
bottom_pane: BottomPane::new(BottomPaneParams {
|
|
|
|
|
|
app_event_tx,
|
|
|
|
|
|
has_input_focus: true,
|
|
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
|
|
input_focus: InputFocus::BottomPane,
|
2025-04-27 21:47:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
config,
|
2025-05-17 09:00:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
initial_user_message: create_initial_user_message(
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial_prompt.unwrap_or_default(),
|
|
|
|
|
|
initial_images,
|
|
|
|
|
|
),
|
feat: show number of tokens remaining in UI (#1388)
When using the OpenAI Responses API, we now record the `usage` field for
a `"response.completed"` event, which includes metrics about the number
of tokens consumed. We also introduce `openai_model_info.rs`, which
includes current data about the most common OpenAI models available via
the API (specifically `context_window` and `max_output_tokens`). If
Codex does not recognize the model, you can set `model_context_window`
and `model_max_output_tokens` explicitly in `config.toml`.
When then introduce a new event type to `protocol.rs`, `TokenCount`,
which includes the `TokenUsage` for the most recent turn.
Finally, we update the TUI to record the running sum of tokens used so
the percentage of available context window remaining can be reported via
the placeholder text for the composer:

We could certainly get much fancier with this (such as reporting the
estimated cost of the conversation), but for now, we are just trying to
achieve feature parity with the TypeScript CLI.
Though arguably this improves upon the TypeScript CLI, as the TypeScript
CLI uses heuristics to estimate the number of tokens used rather than
using the `usage` information directly:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/296996d74e345b1b05d8c3451a06ace21c5ada96/codex-cli/src/utils/approximate-tokens-used.ts#L3-L16
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1242
2025-06-25 23:31:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
token_usage: TokenUsage::default(),
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) fn handle_key_event(&mut self, key_event: KeyEvent) {
|
2025-06-27 13:37:11 -04:00
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.clear_ctrl_c_quit_hint();
|
feat: add support for commands in the Rust TUI (#935)
Introduces support for slash commands like in the TypeScript CLI. We do
not support the full set of commands yet, but the core abstraction is
there now.
In particular, we have a `SlashCommand` enum and due to thoughtful use
of the [strum](https://crates.io/crates/strum) crate, it requires
minimal boilerplate to add a new command to the list.
The key new piece of UI is `CommandPopup`, though the keyboard events
are still handled by `ChatComposer`. The behavior is roughly as follows:
* if the first character in the composer is `/`, the command popup is
displayed (if you really want to send a message to Codex that starts
with a `/`, simply put a space before the `/`)
* while the popup is displayed, up/down can be used to change the
selection of the popup
* if there is a selection, hitting tab completes the command, but does
not send it
* if there is a selection, hitting enter sends the command
* if the prefix of the composer matches a command, the command will be
visible in the popup so the user can see the description (commands could
take arguments, so additional text may appear after the command name
itself)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/39c3e6ee-eeb7-4ef7-a911-466d8184975f
Incidentally, Codex wrote almost all the code for this PR!
2025-05-14 12:55:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Special-case <Tab>: normally toggles focus between history and bottom panes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
// However, when the slash-command popup is visible we forward the key
|
|
|
|
|
|
// to the bottom pane so it can handle auto-completion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
if matches!(key_event.code, crossterm::event::KeyCode::Tab)
|
feat: add support for @ to do file search (#1401)
Introduces support for `@` to trigger a fuzzy-filename search in the
composer. Under the hood, this leverages
https://crates.io/crates/nucleo-matcher to do the fuzzy matching and
https://crates.io/crates/ignore to build up the list of file candidates
(so that it respects `.gitignore`).
For simplicity (at least for now), we do not do any caching between
searches like VS Code does for its file search:
https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/blob/1d89ed699b2e924d418c856318a3e12bca67ff3a/src/vs/workbench/services/search/node/rawSearchService.ts#L212-L218
Because we do not do any caching, I saw queries take up to three seconds
on large repositories with hundreds of thousands of files. To that end,
we do not perform searches synchronously on each keystroke, but instead
dispatch an event to do the search on a background thread that
asynchronously reports back to the UI when the results are available.
This is largely handled by the `FileSearchManager` introduced in this
PR, which also has logic for debouncing requests so there is at most one
search in flight at a time.
While we could potentially polish and tune this feature further, it may
already be overengineered for how it will be used, in practice, so we
can improve things going forward if it turns out that this is not "good
enough" in the wild.
Note this feature does not work like `@` in the TypeScript CLI, which
was more like directory-based tab completion. In the Rust CLI, `@`
triggers a full-repo fuzzy-filename search.
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1261.
2025-06-28 13:47:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
&& !self.bottom_pane.is_popup_visible()
|
feat: add support for commands in the Rust TUI (#935)
Introduces support for slash commands like in the TypeScript CLI. We do
not support the full set of commands yet, but the core abstraction is
there now.
In particular, we have a `SlashCommand` enum and due to thoughtful use
of the [strum](https://crates.io/crates/strum) crate, it requires
minimal boilerplate to add a new command to the list.
The key new piece of UI is `CommandPopup`, though the keyboard events
are still handled by `ChatComposer`. The behavior is roughly as follows:
* if the first character in the composer is `/`, the command popup is
displayed (if you really want to send a message to Codex that starts
with a `/`, simply put a space before the `/`)
* while the popup is displayed, up/down can be used to change the
selection of the popup
* if there is a selection, hitting tab completes the command, but does
not send it
* if there is a selection, hitting enter sends the command
* if the prefix of the composer matches a command, the command will be
visible in the popup so the user can see the description (commands could
take arguments, so additional text may appear after the command name
itself)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/39c3e6ee-eeb7-4ef7-a911-466d8184975f
Incidentally, Codex wrote almost all the code for this PR!
2025-05-14 12:55:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
{
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.input_focus = match self.input_focus {
|
|
|
|
|
|
InputFocus::HistoryPane => InputFocus::BottomPane,
|
|
|
|
|
|
InputFocus::BottomPane => InputFocus::HistoryPane,
|
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.set_input_focus(self.input_focus == InputFocus::HistoryPane);
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane
|
|
|
|
|
|
.set_input_focus(self.input_focus == InputFocus::BottomPane);
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
2025-05-16 19:27:49 -07:00
|
|
|
|
return;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
match self.input_focus {
|
|
|
|
|
|
InputFocus::HistoryPane => {
|
|
|
|
|
|
let needs_redraw = self.conversation_history.handle_key_event(key_event);
|
|
|
|
|
|
if needs_redraw {
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
InputFocus::BottomPane => match self.bottom_pane.handle_key_event(key_event) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
InputResult::Submitted(text) => {
|
2025-05-17 09:00:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.submit_user_message(text.into());
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
InputResult::None => {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-17 09:00:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fn submit_user_message(&mut self, user_message: UserMessage) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
let UserMessage { text, image_paths } = user_message;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
let mut items: Vec<InputItem> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !text.is_empty() {
|
|
|
|
|
|
items.push(InputItem::Text { text: text.clone() });
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for path in image_paths {
|
|
|
|
|
|
items.push(InputItem::LocalImage { path });
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if items.is_empty() {
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
return;
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.codex_op_tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
.send(Op::UserInput { items })
|
|
|
|
|
|
.unwrap_or_else(|e| {
|
|
|
|
|
|
tracing::error!("failed to send message: {e}");
|
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: record messages from user in ~/.codex/history.jsonl (#939)
This is a large change to support a "history" feature like you would
expect in a shell like Bash.
History events are recorded in `$CODEX_HOME/history.jsonl`. Because it
is a JSONL file, it is straightforward to append new entries (as opposed
to the TypeScript file that uses `$CODEX_HOME/history.json`, so to be
valid JSON, each new entry entails rewriting the entire file). Because
it is possible for there to be multiple instances of Codex CLI writing
to `history.jsonl` at once, we use advisory file locking when working
with `history.jsonl` in `codex-rs/core/src/message_history.rs`.
Because we believe history is a sufficiently useful feature, we enable
it by default. Though to provide some safety, we set the file
permissions of `history.jsonl` to be `o600` so that other users on the
system cannot read the user's history. We do not yet support a default
list of `SENSITIVE_PATTERNS` as the TypeScript CLI does:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/3fdf9df1335ac9501e3fb0e61715359145711e8b/codex-cli/src/utils/storage/command-history.ts#L10-L17
We are going to take a more conservative approach to this list in the
Rust CLI. For example, while `/\b[A-Za-z0-9-_]{20,}\b/` might exclude
sensitive information like API tokens, it would also exclude valuable
information such as references to Git commits.
As noted in the updated documentation, users can opt-out of history by
adding the following to `config.toml`:
```toml
[history]
persistence = "none"
```
Because `history.jsonl` could, in theory, be quite large, we take a[n
arguably overly pedantic] approach in reading history entries into
memory. Specifically, we start by telling the client the current number
of entries in the history file (`history_entry_count`) as well as the
inode (`history_log_id`) of `history.jsonl` (see the new fields on
`SessionConfiguredEvent`).
The client is responsible for keeping new entries in memory to create a
"local history," but if the user hits up enough times to go "past" the
end of local history, then the client should use the new
`GetHistoryEntryRequest` in the protocol to fetch older entries.
Specifically, it should pass the `history_log_id` it was given
originally and work backwards from `history_entry_count`. (It should
really fetch history in batches rather than one-at-a-time, but that is
something we can improve upon in subsequent PRs.)
The motivation behind this crazy scheme is that it is designed to defend
against:
* The `history.jsonl` being truncated during the session such that the
index into the history is no longer consistent with what had been read
up to that point. We do not yet have logic to enforce a `max_bytes` for
`history.jsonl`, but once we do, we will aspire to implement it in a way
that should result in a new inode for the file on most systems.
* New items from concurrent Codex CLI sessions amending to the history.
Because, in absence of truncation, `history.jsonl` is an append-only
log, so long as the client reads backwards from `history_entry_count`,
it should always get a consistent view of history. (That said, it will
not be able to read _new_ commands from concurrent sessions, but perhaps
we will introduce a `/` command to reload latest history or something
down the road.)
Admittedly, my testing of this feature thus far has been fairly light. I
expect we will find bugs and introduce enhancements/fixes going forward.
2025-05-15 16:26:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Persist the text to cross-session message history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !text.is_empty() {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.codex_op_tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
.send(Op::AddToHistory { text: text.clone() })
|
|
|
|
|
|
.unwrap_or_else(|e| {
|
|
|
|
|
|
tracing::error!("failed to send AddHistory op: {e}");
|
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Only show text portion in conversation history for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !text.is_empty() {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history.add_user_message(text);
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history.scroll_to_bottom();
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) fn handle_codex_event(&mut self, event: Event) {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
let Event { id, msg } = event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
match msg {
|
2025-05-13 19:22:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::SessionConfigured(event) => {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Record session information at the top of the conversation.
|
2025-04-27 21:47:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
feat: record messages from user in ~/.codex/history.jsonl (#939)
This is a large change to support a "history" feature like you would
expect in a shell like Bash.
History events are recorded in `$CODEX_HOME/history.jsonl`. Because it
is a JSONL file, it is straightforward to append new entries (as opposed
to the TypeScript file that uses `$CODEX_HOME/history.json`, so to be
valid JSON, each new entry entails rewriting the entire file). Because
it is possible for there to be multiple instances of Codex CLI writing
to `history.jsonl` at once, we use advisory file locking when working
with `history.jsonl` in `codex-rs/core/src/message_history.rs`.
Because we believe history is a sufficiently useful feature, we enable
it by default. Though to provide some safety, we set the file
permissions of `history.jsonl` to be `o600` so that other users on the
system cannot read the user's history. We do not yet support a default
list of `SENSITIVE_PATTERNS` as the TypeScript CLI does:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/3fdf9df1335ac9501e3fb0e61715359145711e8b/codex-cli/src/utils/storage/command-history.ts#L10-L17
We are going to take a more conservative approach to this list in the
Rust CLI. For example, while `/\b[A-Za-z0-9-_]{20,}\b/` might exclude
sensitive information like API tokens, it would also exclude valuable
information such as references to Git commits.
As noted in the updated documentation, users can opt-out of history by
adding the following to `config.toml`:
```toml
[history]
persistence = "none"
```
Because `history.jsonl` could, in theory, be quite large, we take a[n
arguably overly pedantic] approach in reading history entries into
memory. Specifically, we start by telling the client the current number
of entries in the history file (`history_entry_count`) as well as the
inode (`history_log_id`) of `history.jsonl` (see the new fields on
`SessionConfiguredEvent`).
The client is responsible for keeping new entries in memory to create a
"local history," but if the user hits up enough times to go "past" the
end of local history, then the client should use the new
`GetHistoryEntryRequest` in the protocol to fetch older entries.
Specifically, it should pass the `history_log_id` it was given
originally and work backwards from `history_entry_count`. (It should
really fetch history in batches rather than one-at-a-time, but that is
something we can improve upon in subsequent PRs.)
The motivation behind this crazy scheme is that it is designed to defend
against:
* The `history.jsonl` being truncated during the session such that the
index into the history is no longer consistent with what had been read
up to that point. We do not yet have logic to enforce a `max_bytes` for
`history.jsonl`, but once we do, we will aspire to implement it in a way
that should result in a new inode for the file on most systems.
* New items from concurrent Codex CLI sessions amending to the history.
Because, in absence of truncation, `history.jsonl` is an append-only
log, so long as the client reads backwards from `history_entry_count`,
it should always get a consistent view of history. (That said, it will
not be able to read _new_ commands from concurrent sessions, but perhaps
we will introduce a `/` command to reload latest history or something
down the road.)
Admittedly, my testing of this feature thus far has been fairly light. I
expect we will find bugs and introduce enhancements/fixes going forward.
2025-05-15 16:26:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
.add_session_info(&self.config, event.clone());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Forward history metadata to the bottom pane so the chat
|
|
|
|
|
|
// composer can navigate through past messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane
|
|
|
|
|
|
.set_history_metadata(event.history_log_id, event.history_entry_count);
|
2025-05-17 09:00:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if let Some(user_message) = self.initial_user_message.take() {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If the user provided an initial message, add it to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
// conversation history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.submit_user_message(user_message);
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::AgentMessage(AgentMessageEvent { message }) => {
|
2025-05-16 11:33:08 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.add_agent_message(&self.config, message);
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::AgentReasoning(AgentReasoningEvent { text }) => {
|
2025-05-30 23:14:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if !self.config.hide_agent_reasoning {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.add_agent_reasoning(&self.config, text);
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-10 21:43:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::TaskStarted => {
|
2025-06-27 13:37:11 -04:00
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.clear_ctrl_c_quit_hint();
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.set_task_running(true);
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-19 16:08:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::TaskComplete(TaskCompleteEvent {
|
|
|
|
|
|
last_agent_message: _,
|
|
|
|
|
|
}) => {
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.set_task_running(false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
feat: show number of tokens remaining in UI (#1388)
When using the OpenAI Responses API, we now record the `usage` field for
a `"response.completed"` event, which includes metrics about the number
of tokens consumed. We also introduce `openai_model_info.rs`, which
includes current data about the most common OpenAI models available via
the API (specifically `context_window` and `max_output_tokens`). If
Codex does not recognize the model, you can set `model_context_window`
and `model_max_output_tokens` explicitly in `config.toml`.
When then introduce a new event type to `protocol.rs`, `TokenCount`,
which includes the `TokenUsage` for the most recent turn.
Finally, we update the TUI to record the running sum of tokens used so
the percentage of available context window remaining can be reported via
the placeholder text for the composer:

We could certainly get much fancier with this (such as reporting the
estimated cost of the conversation), but for now, we are just trying to
achieve feature parity with the TypeScript CLI.
Though arguably this improves upon the TypeScript CLI, as the TypeScript
CLI uses heuristics to estimate the number of tokens used rather than
using the `usage` information directly:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/296996d74e345b1b05d8c3451a06ace21c5ada96/codex-cli/src/utils/approximate-tokens-used.ts#L3-L16
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1242
2025-06-25 23:31:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::TokenCount(token_usage) => {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.token_usage = add_token_usage(&self.token_usage, &token_usage);
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane
|
|
|
|
|
|
.set_token_usage(self.token_usage.clone(), self.config.model_context_window);
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::Error(ErrorEvent { message }) => {
|
2025-05-08 21:46:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history.add_error(message);
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.set_task_running(false);
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::ExecApprovalRequest(ExecApprovalRequestEvent {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
command,
|
|
|
|
|
|
cwd,
|
|
|
|
|
|
reason,
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}) => {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
let request = ApprovalRequest::Exec {
|
|
|
|
|
|
id,
|
|
|
|
|
|
command,
|
|
|
|
|
|
cwd,
|
|
|
|
|
|
reason,
|
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.push_approval_request(request);
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::ApplyPatchApprovalRequest(ApplyPatchApprovalRequestEvent {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
changes,
|
|
|
|
|
|
reason,
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant_root,
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}) => {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// ------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Before we even prompt the user for approval we surface the patch
|
|
|
|
|
|
// summary in the main conversation so that the dialog appears in a
|
|
|
|
|
|
// sensible chronological order:
|
|
|
|
|
|
// (1) codex → proposes patch (HistoryCell::PendingPatch)
|
|
|
|
|
|
// (2) UI → asks for approval (BottomPane)
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This mirrors how command execution is shown (command begins →
|
|
|
|
|
|
// approval dialog) and avoids surprising the user with a modal
|
|
|
|
|
|
// prompt before they have seen *what* is being requested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.add_patch_event(PatchEventType::ApprovalRequest, changes);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history.scroll_to_bottom();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now surface the approval request in the BottomPane as before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
let request = ApprovalRequest::ApplyPatch {
|
|
|
|
|
|
id,
|
|
|
|
|
|
reason,
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant_root,
|
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.push_approval_request(request);
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::ExecCommandBegin(ExecCommandBeginEvent {
|
|
|
|
|
|
call_id,
|
|
|
|
|
|
command,
|
|
|
|
|
|
cwd: _,
|
|
|
|
|
|
}) => {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.add_active_exec_command(call_id, command);
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::PatchApplyBegin(PatchApplyBeginEvent {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
call_id: _,
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto_approved,
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes,
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}) => {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Even when a patch is auto‑approved we still display the
|
|
|
|
|
|
// summary so the user can follow along.
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.add_patch_event(PatchEventType::ApplyBegin { auto_approved }, changes);
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !auto_approved {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history.scroll_to_bottom();
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::ExecCommandEnd(ExecCommandEndEvent {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
call_id,
|
|
|
|
|
|
exit_code,
|
|
|
|
|
|
stdout,
|
|
|
|
|
|
stderr,
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}) => {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.record_completed_exec_command(call_id, stdout, stderr, exit_code);
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::McpToolCallBegin(McpToolCallBeginEvent {
|
2025-05-06 16:12:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
call_id,
|
|
|
|
|
|
server,
|
|
|
|
|
|
tool,
|
|
|
|
|
|
arguments,
|
2025-05-13 20:44:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}) => {
|
2025-05-06 16:12:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.add_active_mcp_tool_call(call_id, server, tool, arguments);
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
2025-05-06 16:12:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
fix: introduce ResponseInputItem::McpToolCallOutput variant (#1151)
The output of an MCP server tool call can be one of several types, but
to date, we treated all outputs as text by showing the serialized JSON
as the "tool output" in Codex:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/25a9949c49194d5a64de54a11bcc5b4724ac9bd5/codex-rs/mcp-types/src/lib.rs#L96-L101
This PR adds support for the `ImageContent` variant so we can now
display an image output from an MCP tool call.
In making this change, we introduce a new
`ResponseInputItem::McpToolCallOutput` variant so that we can work with
the `mcp_types::CallToolResult` directly when the function call is made
to an MCP server.
Though arguably the more significant change is the introduction of
`HistoryCell::CompletedMcpToolCallWithImageOutput`, which is a cell that
uses `ratatui_image` to render an image into the terminal. To support
this, we introduce `ImageRenderCache`, cache a
`ratatui_image::picker::Picker`, and `ensure_image_cache()` to cache the
appropriate scaled image data and dimensions based on the current
terminal size.
To test, I created a minimal `package.json`:
```json
{
"name": "kitty-mcp",
"version": "1.0.0",
"type": "module",
"description": "MCP that returns image of kitty",
"main": "index.js",
"dependencies": {
"@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^1.12.0"
}
}
```
with the following `index.js` to define the MCP server:
```js
#!/usr/bin/env node
import { McpServer } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/mcp.js";
import { StdioServerTransport } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/stdio.js";
import { readFile } from "node:fs/promises";
import { join } from "node:path";
const IMAGE_URI = "image://Ada.png";
const server = new McpServer({
name: "Demo",
version: "1.0.0",
});
server.tool(
"get-cat-image",
"If you need a cat image, this tool will provide one.",
async () => ({
content: [
{ type: "image", data: await getAdaPngBase64(), mimeType: "image/png" },
],
})
);
server.resource("Ada the Cat", IMAGE_URI, async (uri) => {
const base64Image = await getAdaPngBase64();
return {
contents: [
{
uri: uri.href,
mimeType: "image/png",
blob: base64Image,
},
],
};
});
async function getAdaPngBase64() {
const __dirname = new URL(".", import.meta.url).pathname;
// From https://github.com/benjajaja/ratatui-image/blob/9705ce2c59ec669abbce2924cbfd1f5ae22c9860/assets/Ada.png
const filePath = join(__dirname, "Ada.png");
const imageData = await readFile(filePath);
const base64Image = imageData.toString("base64");
return base64Image;
}
const transport = new StdioServerTransport();
await server.connect(transport);
```
With the local changes from this PR, I added the following to my
`config.toml`:
```toml
[mcp_servers.kitty]
command = "node"
args = ["/Users/mbolin/code/kitty-mcp/index.js"]
```
Running the TUI from source:
```
cargo run --bin codex -- --model o3 'I need a picture of a cat'
```
I get:
<img width="732" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bf80b721-9ca0-4d81-aec7-77d6899e2869"
/>
Now, that said, I have only tested in iTerm and there is definitely some
funny business with getting an accurate character-to-pixel ratio
(sometimes the `CompletedMcpToolCallWithImageOutput` thinks it needs 10
rows to render instead of 4), so there is still work to be done here.
2025-05-28 19:03:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::McpToolCallEnd(mcp_tool_call_end_event) => {
|
|
|
|
|
|
let success = mcp_tool_call_end_event.is_success();
|
|
|
|
|
|
let McpToolCallEndEvent { call_id, result } = mcp_tool_call_end_event;
|
2025-05-06 16:12:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.record_completed_mcp_tool_call(call_id, success, result);
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
2025-05-06 16:12:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
feat: record messages from user in ~/.codex/history.jsonl (#939)
This is a large change to support a "history" feature like you would
expect in a shell like Bash.
History events are recorded in `$CODEX_HOME/history.jsonl`. Because it
is a JSONL file, it is straightforward to append new entries (as opposed
to the TypeScript file that uses `$CODEX_HOME/history.json`, so to be
valid JSON, each new entry entails rewriting the entire file). Because
it is possible for there to be multiple instances of Codex CLI writing
to `history.jsonl` at once, we use advisory file locking when working
with `history.jsonl` in `codex-rs/core/src/message_history.rs`.
Because we believe history is a sufficiently useful feature, we enable
it by default. Though to provide some safety, we set the file
permissions of `history.jsonl` to be `o600` so that other users on the
system cannot read the user's history. We do not yet support a default
list of `SENSITIVE_PATTERNS` as the TypeScript CLI does:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/3fdf9df1335ac9501e3fb0e61715359145711e8b/codex-cli/src/utils/storage/command-history.ts#L10-L17
We are going to take a more conservative approach to this list in the
Rust CLI. For example, while `/\b[A-Za-z0-9-_]{20,}\b/` might exclude
sensitive information like API tokens, it would also exclude valuable
information such as references to Git commits.
As noted in the updated documentation, users can opt-out of history by
adding the following to `config.toml`:
```toml
[history]
persistence = "none"
```
Because `history.jsonl` could, in theory, be quite large, we take a[n
arguably overly pedantic] approach in reading history entries into
memory. Specifically, we start by telling the client the current number
of entries in the history file (`history_entry_count`) as well as the
inode (`history_log_id`) of `history.jsonl` (see the new fields on
`SessionConfiguredEvent`).
The client is responsible for keeping new entries in memory to create a
"local history," but if the user hits up enough times to go "past" the
end of local history, then the client should use the new
`GetHistoryEntryRequest` in the protocol to fetch older entries.
Specifically, it should pass the `history_log_id` it was given
originally and work backwards from `history_entry_count`. (It should
really fetch history in batches rather than one-at-a-time, but that is
something we can improve upon in subsequent PRs.)
The motivation behind this crazy scheme is that it is designed to defend
against:
* The `history.jsonl` being truncated during the session such that the
index into the history is no longer consistent with what had been read
up to that point. We do not yet have logic to enforce a `max_bytes` for
`history.jsonl`, but once we do, we will aspire to implement it in a way
that should result in a new inode for the file on most systems.
* New items from concurrent Codex CLI sessions amending to the history.
Because, in absence of truncation, `history.jsonl` is an append-only
log, so long as the client reads backwards from `history_entry_count`,
it should always get a consistent view of history. (That said, it will
not be able to read _new_ commands from concurrent sessions, but perhaps
we will introduce a `/` command to reload latest history or something
down the road.)
Admittedly, my testing of this feature thus far has been fairly light. I
expect we will find bugs and introduce enhancements/fixes going forward.
2025-05-15 16:26:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
EventMsg::GetHistoryEntryResponse(event) => {
|
|
|
|
|
|
let codex_core::protocol::GetHistoryEntryResponseEvent {
|
|
|
|
|
|
offset,
|
|
|
|
|
|
log_id,
|
|
|
|
|
|
entry,
|
|
|
|
|
|
} = event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Inform bottom pane / composer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane
|
|
|
|
|
|
.on_history_entry_response(log_id, offset, entry.map(|e| e.text));
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
event => {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history
|
|
|
|
|
|
.add_background_event(format!("{event:?}"));
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Update the live log preview while a task is running.
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) fn update_latest_log(&mut self, line: String) {
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Forward only if we are currently showing the status indicator.
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.update_status_text(line);
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fn request_redraw(&mut self) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.app_event_tx.send(AppEvent::Redraw);
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-06-26 13:03:31 -07:00
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) fn add_diff_output(&mut self, diff_output: String) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history.add_diff_output(diff_output);
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) fn handle_scroll_delta(&mut self, scroll_delta: i32) {
|
2025-04-25 12:01:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// If the user is trying to scroll exactly one line, we let them, but
|
|
|
|
|
|
// otherwise we assume they are trying to scroll in larger increments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
let magnified_scroll_delta = if scroll_delta == 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Play with this: perhaps it should be non-linear?
|
|
|
|
|
|
scroll_delta * 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history.scroll(magnified_scroll_delta);
|
2025-05-15 14:50:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.request_redraw();
|
2025-04-25 12:01:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: add support for @ to do file search (#1401)
Introduces support for `@` to trigger a fuzzy-filename search in the
composer. Under the hood, this leverages
https://crates.io/crates/nucleo-matcher to do the fuzzy matching and
https://crates.io/crates/ignore to build up the list of file candidates
(so that it respects `.gitignore`).
For simplicity (at least for now), we do not do any caching between
searches like VS Code does for its file search:
https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/blob/1d89ed699b2e924d418c856318a3e12bca67ff3a/src/vs/workbench/services/search/node/rawSearchService.ts#L212-L218
Because we do not do any caching, I saw queries take up to three seconds
on large repositories with hundreds of thousands of files. To that end,
we do not perform searches synchronously on each keystroke, but instead
dispatch an event to do the search on a background thread that
asynchronously reports back to the UI when the results are available.
This is largely handled by the `FileSearchManager` introduced in this
PR, which also has logic for debouncing requests so there is at most one
search in flight at a time.
While we could potentially polish and tune this feature further, it may
already be overengineered for how it will be used, in practice, so we
can improve things going forward if it turns out that this is not "good
enough" in the wild.
Note this feature does not work like `@` in the TypeScript CLI, which
was more like directory-based tab completion. In the Rust CLI, `@`
triggers a full-repo fuzzy-filename search.
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1261.
2025-06-28 13:47:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
/// Forward file-search results to the bottom pane.
|
2025-06-28 15:04:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) fn apply_file_search_result(&mut self, query: String, matches: Vec<FileMatch>) {
|
feat: add support for @ to do file search (#1401)
Introduces support for `@` to trigger a fuzzy-filename search in the
composer. Under the hood, this leverages
https://crates.io/crates/nucleo-matcher to do the fuzzy matching and
https://crates.io/crates/ignore to build up the list of file candidates
(so that it respects `.gitignore`).
For simplicity (at least for now), we do not do any caching between
searches like VS Code does for its file search:
https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/blob/1d89ed699b2e924d418c856318a3e12bca67ff3a/src/vs/workbench/services/search/node/rawSearchService.ts#L212-L218
Because we do not do any caching, I saw queries take up to three seconds
on large repositories with hundreds of thousands of files. To that end,
we do not perform searches synchronously on each keystroke, but instead
dispatch an event to do the search on a background thread that
asynchronously reports back to the UI when the results are available.
This is largely handled by the `FileSearchManager` introduced in this
PR, which also has logic for debouncing requests so there is at most one
search in flight at a time.
While we could potentially polish and tune this feature further, it may
already be overengineered for how it will be used, in practice, so we
can improve things going forward if it turns out that this is not "good
enough" in the wild.
Note this feature does not work like `@` in the TypeScript CLI, which
was more like directory-based tab completion. In the Rust CLI, `@`
triggers a full-repo fuzzy-filename search.
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1261.
2025-06-28 13:47:42 -07:00
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.on_file_search_result(query, matches);
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-06-27 13:37:11 -04:00
|
|
|
|
/// Handle Ctrl-C key press.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Returns true if the key press was handled, false if it was not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// If the key press was not handled, the caller should handle it (likely by exiting the process).
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) fn on_ctrl_c(&mut self) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
|
|
if self.bottom_pane.is_task_running() {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.clear_ctrl_c_quit_hint();
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.submit_op(Op::Interrupt);
|
|
|
|
|
|
false
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else if self.bottom_pane.ctrl_c_quit_hint_visible() {
|
|
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.bottom_pane.show_ctrl_c_quit_hint();
|
|
|
|
|
|
false
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
/// Forward an `Op` directly to codex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub(crate) fn submit_op(&self, op: Op) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
if let Err(e) = self.codex_op_tx.send(op) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
tracing::error!("failed to submit op: {e}");
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl WidgetRef for &ChatWidget<'_> {
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn render_ref(&self, area: Rect, buf: &mut Buffer) {
|
2025-05-14 10:13:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
let bottom_height = self.bottom_pane.calculate_required_height(&area);
|
feat: initial import of Rust implementation of Codex CLI in codex-rs/ (#629)
As stated in `codex-rs/README.md`:
Today, Codex CLI is written in TypeScript and requires Node.js 22+ to
run it. For a number of users, this runtime requirement inhibits
adoption: they would be better served by a standalone executable. As
maintainers, we want Codex to run efficiently in a wide range of
environments with minimal overhead. We also want to take advantage of
operating system-specific APIs to provide better sandboxing, where
possible.
To that end, we are moving forward with a Rust implementation of Codex
CLI contained in this folder, which has the following benefits:
- The CLI compiles to small, standalone, platform-specific binaries.
- Can make direct, native calls to
[seccomp](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html) and
[landlock](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/landlock.7.html) in
order to support sandboxing on Linux.
- No runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
and better, more predictable performance.
Currently, the Rust implementation is materially behind the TypeScript
implementation in functionality, so continue to use the TypeScript
implmentation for the time being. We will publish native executables via
GitHub Releases as soon as we feel the Rust version is usable.
2025-04-24 13:31:40 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let chunks = Layout::default()
|
|
|
|
|
|
.direction(Direction::Vertical)
|
|
|
|
|
|
.constraints([Constraint::Min(0), Constraint::Length(bottom_height)])
|
|
|
|
|
|
.split(area);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.conversation_history.render(chunks[0], buf);
|
|
|
|
|
|
(&self.bottom_pane).render(chunks[1], buf);
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
feat: show number of tokens remaining in UI (#1388)
When using the OpenAI Responses API, we now record the `usage` field for
a `"response.completed"` event, which includes metrics about the number
of tokens consumed. We also introduce `openai_model_info.rs`, which
includes current data about the most common OpenAI models available via
the API (specifically `context_window` and `max_output_tokens`). If
Codex does not recognize the model, you can set `model_context_window`
and `model_max_output_tokens` explicitly in `config.toml`.
When then introduce a new event type to `protocol.rs`, `TokenCount`,
which includes the `TokenUsage` for the most recent turn.
Finally, we update the TUI to record the running sum of tokens used so
the percentage of available context window remaining can be reported via
the placeholder text for the composer:

We could certainly get much fancier with this (such as reporting the
estimated cost of the conversation), but for now, we are just trying to
achieve feature parity with the TypeScript CLI.
Though arguably this improves upon the TypeScript CLI, as the TypeScript
CLI uses heuristics to estimate the number of tokens used rather than
using the `usage` information directly:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/296996d74e345b1b05d8c3451a06ace21c5ada96/codex-cli/src/utils/approximate-tokens-used.ts#L3-L16
Fixes https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1242
2025-06-25 23:31:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn add_token_usage(current_usage: &TokenUsage, new_usage: &TokenUsage) -> TokenUsage {
|
|
|
|
|
|
let cached_input_tokens = match (
|
|
|
|
|
|
current_usage.cached_input_tokens,
|
|
|
|
|
|
new_usage.cached_input_tokens,
|
|
|
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Some(current), Some(new)) => Some(current + new),
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Some(current), None) => Some(current),
|
|
|
|
|
|
(None, Some(new)) => Some(new),
|
|
|
|
|
|
(None, None) => None,
|
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
let reasoning_output_tokens = match (
|
|
|
|
|
|
current_usage.reasoning_output_tokens,
|
|
|
|
|
|
new_usage.reasoning_output_tokens,
|
|
|
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Some(current), Some(new)) => Some(current + new),
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Some(current), None) => Some(current),
|
|
|
|
|
|
(None, Some(new)) => Some(new),
|
|
|
|
|
|
(None, None) => None,
|
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
TokenUsage {
|
|
|
|
|
|
input_tokens: current_usage.input_tokens + new_usage.input_tokens,
|
|
|
|
|
|
cached_input_tokens,
|
|
|
|
|
|
output_tokens: current_usage.output_tokens + new_usage.output_tokens,
|
|
|
|
|
|
reasoning_output_tokens,
|
|
|
|
|
|
total_tokens: current_usage.total_tokens + new_usage.total_tokens,
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|